2011 Ford Explorer: ‘Jaw-Dropping’ MPG, Adventurer Appeal

2008 Ford Explorer America Concept

With the introduction of the 2011 Ford Explorer, Ford will have three different crossover utility vehicles—Explorer, Edge, and Flex—all selling beside each other at showrooms, all approximately the same size, and with two of the three (the Explorer and Flex) on the same platform as the Taurus sedan.

Is there room for a third model without cannibalizing sales for the others? That's what TheCarConnection.com asked Ford sales analyst George Pipas, who had just finished a discussion on market growth for small cars—including that Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) expects U.S. sales of small vehicles (cars and crossovers combined) to grow to 36 percent of the market by 2013.

"If we're right about the 36 percent, that still means that 64 percent is medium and large, at least in the next five years," said Pipas. "Yes, we expect small cars to grow more. But there will still be plenty of mediums and larges rolling around," and it will take multiple models to meet a wide range of shopper needs, he explained.

One of those medium utility vehicles will be the 2011 Explorer. "We believe there's a market, for people who are living a lifestyle of adventure," said Pipas. "But we've got to make this thing fuel-efficient because if it's only 19 [mpg], then that's not the direction we're headed. It has to be something jaw-dropping."

Ford has said very little yet about the 2011 Ford Explorer officially, though with this week's announcement that it will be built in Chicago, it said that the new utility vehicle will have "unibody construction, Ford's EcoBoost engine technology, a six-speed transmission and lightweight materials."

Read more

2011 Ford Explorer Mule Captured

2011 Ford Explorer mule, captured by Ryan O'Keefe

It takes a lot of determination to capture new-car mules in the wild. It takes even more to do so in the chilly wintertime. But the cojones that Ryan O'Keefe demonstrates as he videotapes this 2011 Ford Explorer tester...well,  we can only imagine that the guy's riding in a BIG bucket seat.

Ford fans can take a gander at the clip below. With all that cover-up, we can't say much about the SUV's design -- although it seems boxier than previous editions, closer to some Jeep models like the Patriot than the Explorer profile we've come to know. (Ryan helpfully includes a rendering at the end of the clip, to give an idea of the Explorer's refreshed exterior.)

We're guessing that Ford still has some tinkering to before the 2011 Explorer makes its world debut. Detroit is probably too soon to expect a showing, but we wouldn't be surprised to see the Explorer drop trou in New York this spring. Stay tuned.

[RyanOKeefe]


Permalink:2011 Ford Explorer Mule Captured

Kia Drops 2010 Borrego From Lineup, Fate TBD

2009 Kia Borrego

The Kia Borrego could be a one-year wonder.

The South Korean automaker says the full-size Borrego sport-utility vehicle will not return to the U.S. for the 2010 model year.

The Borrego arrived on the market late in 2008, a victim of poor timing and bad luck. Kia had hoped to sell up to 20,000 Borregos each year, but the U.S. launch coincided with high gas prices and the financial crisis that together, slashed SUV sales to half their 2007 levels.

Kia sold 825 Borregos in November. For 2009 through the end of November, Kia has sold 9,510 Borrego SUVs in the U.S. The Borrego also is sold in its home market as the Mohave, and Korean sales have been more brisk.

While it's been a slow mover on American dealer lots, the Borrego's been relatively well received in the automotive press. TheCarConnection's experts gave the 2009 Borrego a rating of 7.8 out of 10. TCC praised the Borrego's smooth powertrain and expansive interior, while taking issue with its styling and some interior materials. TheCarConnection's Bottom Line: "The Borrego isn't the type of vehicle that's especially popular or fashionable at this time, but it's a home run against the competition," which includes the current Ford Explorer, Jeep Grand Cherokee and Nissan Pathfinder.

Though the Borrego won't be sold as a 2010 model, a Kia spokesman tells us the company could not rule out a future return--leaving its fate "TBD."


Permalink:Kia Drops 2010 Borrego From Lineup, Fate TBD

Firestone, Clunkers and Chapter 11: The Decade in Car News

Bob Lutz and 50 Cent

As 2009 draws to a close this week, the auto industry is waving goodbye to a decade--and in some corners, waving it good riddance.

The "Naughties" might be the best neologism for this lost decade. It began with new alliances forming and new empires emerging, and ends on Friday in a multi-car pileup of cratered sales, shuttered brands and factories, wiped-out shareholders, and only a faint glimmer of hope for recovery in 2010.

There's been huge disruption around the carmaking globe since 2000, against a backdrop of titanic clashes of egos, epic battles of highly anticipated new products--and inevitably, the sound of an economic freight train approaching.

Who would have imagined the epic fail of the American auto industry in a pre-9/11, pre-iPhone, pre Bush v. Gore world? Who could have thought GM would fall as hard as it did--with Toyota taking a stumble right behind it? Would anyone ever have foreseen Porsche being swallowed up by Volkswagen?

Will someone please explain exactly how we were to expect Bob Lutz and 50 Cent in the same room--much less on the same stage--for the stillborn return of the El Camino?

TheCarConnection.com's editors have watched and written these stories as they unfolded right before us, live and on the Web. We've culled our best memories of our longest news days down to the ten stories that defined the 2000s.

We've left a few on the cutting room floor, too. Cash for clunkers? Big news, but ultimately a government-induced anomaly. The rise of South Korean automakers like Hyundai and Kia? A huge story, but one already in the works in the 1990s. Aztek? Leave it alone. Just leave it alone.

As we look back wistfully at the days when tires were the most Detroit had to worry about, TheCarConnection.com's team has chosen these as the top car news stories of the decade: Read more

2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac

In order to arrange the attached Full Review covering the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac, the editors of TheCarConnection.com read a wide range of reviews and bring you highlights. But here, in this Bottom Line, the editors sum up all the attributes of the Sport Trac, with firsthand driving impressions, to give you the best advice on how it matches up against other trucks.

Likes
Tough, rust-proof bed
Almost full-size towing ability
SYNC interface

Dislikes
Outdated interior
V-6 gets worse mileage than V-8
Engine noise (V-6)

At first sight, the new 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac can be a bit of a mystery. Is it an SUV with a pickup bed or a pickup with an especially large cab?

Technically, it is an SUV (Ford lists it as such on its Web site), but it does deliver the best of both worlds. Although based on the Explorer--and with no real styling surprises inside or out--it's actually 17 inches longer; the passenger compartment is nearly identical to that of the Explorer, but the rear cargo area of the Explorer is replaced with a 4.5-foot cargo bed made from a dent-proof and rust-proof plastic compound. The interior has a similar look and feel to the Ford Explorer, which isn't a bad thing.

Overall, the Sport Trac changes very little for 2010, save for some minor modifications. The standard drivetrain for the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac is a 210-horsepower, 4.0-liter V-6 mated to a five-speed automatic, but there's an optional 292 -horsepower, 4.6-liter V-8 matched with a six-speed automatic transmission available. There's a choice of the standard rear-wheel drive or Ford's ControlTrac four-wheel drive if you want extra traction. Unlike an AWD system, ControlTrac is a true 4WD system, with a two-speed transfer case that features a low range just in case the Sport Trac heads off-road. The design is inherently useful for hauling, and with the optional V-8, the Explorer Sport Trac can tow more than 7,160 pounds.

Considering that the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac is a mid-size SUV/pickup with truck roots, it drives pretty much as you might expect from such a vehicle. You won't find ride quality particularly pleasant, and the SportTrac doesn't handle especially well on curvy roads, squealing the tires around moderately sharp corners, especially on rough surfaces. But it should be fine for most everyday needs. Between the standard V-6 and optional V-8, we would almost unconditionally recommend the V-8; although the V-6 has enough power for a light load, it can get noisy and coarse when loaded, and surprisingly the V-8 rear-wheel-drive Explorer Sport Trac is more fuel-efficient.

The cabin of the 2010 Explorer Sport Trac is spacious and quite comfortable; five will fit, if three are willing to be elbow-to-elbow in back. The quality of the interior, including materials and fit/finish, is acceptable but not up to the level of some of Ford's newer products that are focused at passengers, like the Edge and Flex crossovers.

The Sport Trac has performed quite well in government crash tests, indicating that it's a safe vehicle to be in if you're in a collision. Keep in mind, however, that the federal government has given the rear-wheel-drive version of the Sport Trac only three stars in its rollover rating, which means it's more likely to roll if tripped in an accident. Aiding security is Trailer Sway Control, which helps warn the driver of instability when towing and keep the trailer in line.

The Explorer Sport Trac comes very well equipped compared to compact pickup trucks. Standard features, even on the base XLT, include full power accessories, cruise control, air conditioning, and Sirius Satellite Radio. The Limited loads the Sport Trac with such things as fancier wheels, heated leather seats, an upgraded center console, and Ford's SYNC entertainment/navigation system. Adrenalin models add a more aggressive appearance to the Limited's equipment, including 20-inch polished aluminum wheels, dual exhaust tips, black fascias, and monotone perforated leather seats. A moonroof, a premium sound system with subwoofer and six-disc changer, and a next-generation voice-activated navigation system from Sirius Travel Link are among the most desirable options.

The Bottom Line: If you're torn between an SUV and a pickup and cutting-edge styling isn't important, the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac might be the answer.

Other Choices
If you're interested in the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac, also consider:

- Honda Ridgeline
- Nissan Frontier
- Toyota Tacoma
- Chevrolet Colorado
- Dodge Dakota

Reason Why:
The 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac competes with four-door variants from both compact and mid-size pickup segments, although its size is definitely mid-size. The Chevrolet Colorado and its nearly identical sibling, the GMC Canyon, now have an available V-8 that makes them much more competitive, as their rough five-cylinder engine isn't recommended. The Nissan and Toyota mid-size trucks are not earth-shattering in terms of performance or versatility, but they are worth a look, as they provide nearly even competition to the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac in most every area of consideration. The Dodge Dakota was updated in 2008, and its longer traditional steel bed might be an advantage for some buyers. Honda's Ridgeline is an interesting alternative. Though the Explorer Sport Trac outdoes the Ridgeline in real truck tasks like towing, hauling, or off-roading, it's clearly better for on-road duty with passengers, offering superior ride and handling.

Buying Tip
This is the final production year for the Explorer Sport Trac, so you should be able to land a pretty good deal.


Permalink:2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac

2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Bottom Line

In order to arrange the attached Full Review covering the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac, the editors of TheCarConnection.com read a wide range of reviews and bring you highlights. But here, in this Bottom Line, the editors sum up all the attributes of the Sport Trac, with firsthand driving impressions, to give you the best advice on how it matches up against other trucks.

Likes
Tough, rust-proof bed
Almost full-size towing ability
SYNC interface

Dislikes
Outdated interior
V-6 gets worse mileage than V-8
Engine noise (V-6)

At first sight, the new 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac can be a bit of a mystery. Is it an SUV with a pickup bed or a pickup with an especially large cab?

Technically, it is an SUV (Ford lists it as such on its Web site), but it does deliver the best of both worlds. Although based on the Explorer—and with no real styling surprises inside or out—it's actually 17 inches longer; the passenger compartment is nearly identical to that of the Explorer, but the rear cargo area of the Explorer is replaced with a 4.5-foot cargo bed made from a dent-proof and rust-proof plastic compound. The interior has a similar look and feel to the Ford Explorer, which isn't a bad thing.

Overall, the Sport Trac changes very little for 2010, save for some minor modifications. The standard drivetrain for the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac is a 210-horsepower, 4.0-liter V-6 mated to a five-speed automatic, but there's an optional 292 -horsepower, 4.6-liter V-8 matched with a six-speed automatic transmission available. There's a choice of the standard rear-wheel drive or Ford's ControlTrac four-wheel drive if you want extra traction. Unlike an AWD system, ControlTrac is a true 4WD system, with a two-speed transfer case that features a low range just in case the Sport Trac heads off-road. The design is inherently useful for hauling, and with the optional V-8, the Explorer Sport Trac can tow more than 7,160 pounds.

Considering that the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac is a mid-size SUV/pickup with truck roots, it drives pretty much as you might expect from such a vehicle. You won't find ride quality particularly pleasant, and the SportTrac doesn't handle especially well on curvy roads, squealing the tires around moderately sharp corners, especially on rough surfaces. But it should be fine for most everyday needs. Between the standard V-6 and optional V-8, we would almost unconditionally recommend the V-8; although the V-6 has enough power for a light load, it can get noisy and coarse when loaded, and surprisingly the V-8 rear-wheel-drive Explorer Sport Trac is more fuel-efficient.

The cabin of the 2010 Explorer Sport Trac is spacious and quite comfortable; five will fit, if three are willing to be elbow-to-elbow in back. The quality of the interior, including materials and fit/finish, is acceptable but not up to the level of some of Ford's newer products that are focused at passengers, like the Edge and Flex crossovers.

The Sport Trac has performed quite well in government crash tests, indicating that it's a safe vehicle to be in if you're in a collision. Keep in mind, however, that the federal government has given the rear-wheel-drive version of the Sport Trac only three stars in its rollover rating, which means it's more likely to roll if tripped in an accident. Aiding security is Trailer Sway Control, which helps warn the driver of instability when towing and keep the trailer in line.

The Explorer Sport Trac comes very well equipped compared to compact pickup trucks. Standard features, even on the base XLT, include full power accessories, cruise control, air conditioning, and Sirius Satellite Radio. The Limited loads the Sport Trac with such things as fancier wheels, heated leather seats, an upgraded center console, and Ford's SYNC entertainment/navigation system. Adrenalin models add a more aggressive appearance to the Limited's equipment, including 20-inch polished aluminum wheels, dual exhaust tips, black fascias, and monotone perforated leather seats. A moonroof, a premium sound system with subwoofer and six-disc changer, and a next-generation voice-activated navigation system from Sirius Travel Link are among the most desirable options.

The Bottom Line: If you're torn between an SUV and a pickup and cutting-edge styling isn't important, the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac might be the answer.

Other Choices
If you're interested in the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac, also consider:

- Honda Ridgeline
- Nissan Frontier
- Toyota Tacoma
- Chevrolet Colorado
- Dodge Dakota

Reason Why:
The 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac competes with four-door variants from both compact and mid-size pickup segments, although its size is definitely mid-size. The Chevrolet Colorado and its nearly identical sibling, the GMC Canyon, now have an available V-8 that makes them much more competitive, as their rough five-cylinder engine isn't recommended. The Nissan and Toyota mid-size trucks are not earth-shattering in terms of performance or versatility, but they are worth a look, as they provide nearly even competition to the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac in most every area of consideration. The Dodge Dakota was updated in 2008, and its longer traditional steel bed might be an advantage for some buyers. Honda's Ridgeline is an interesting alternative. Though the Explorer Sport Trac outdoes the Ridgeline in real truck tasks like towing, hauling, or off-roading, it's clearly better for on-road duty with passengers, offering superior ride and handling.

Buying Tip
This is the final production year for the Explorer Sport Trac, so you should be able to land a pretty good deal.


Permalink:2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Bottom Line

Toyota Not Planning On Many Takers For 4-Cylinder 4Runner

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5

Toyota is bringing an economical new four-cylinder engine back to the base SR5 version of its fully redesigned 2010 4Runner. But as we recently discovered, this doesn't significantly improve fuel economy for this body-on-frame ute. Instead though, it appears to enable Toyota to offer a value-leader model at an even more affordable price.

The 2010 Toyota 4Runner starts at $27,500 for the four-cylinder, rear-wheel-drive SR5. That's an $1,140 price cut versus the base RWD 2009 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V-6. This year's base V-6 4Runner runs $29,175, however.

Once upon a time, most of Toyota's 4Runners in the U.S. were sold with economical four-cylinder engines. That was the '80s, but Toyota did offer a four-cylinder version all the way through the beginning of this decade, and just a few years later, for 2003, Toyota began offering a V-8 on the 4Runner.

This year, the V-8 is no more. The new four--the same 2.7-liter engine that's also installed in the Tacoma-- makes 157 horsepower and 178 lb-ft of torque and is only offered with two-wheel drive, in 4Runner SR5 trim. An official suggested that other models weren't offered because of concerns that the model would be underpowered with 4WD or as a Trail model.

One look at the official EPA fuel economy ratings give you another perspective--and a lesson that smaller engines don't always bring better fuel economy. The four-cylinder engine isn't likely to save you much, if any, money over the long run in the 4Runner, because even in four-cylinder form the engine hauls around nearly 4,300 pounds of curb weight.

The four-cylinder 2010 4Runner is rated at 18 mpg city, 23 highway, while the V-6 4Runner, with rear-wheel drive, does almost as well, at 17/23 (17/22 with 4WD). Towing capacity is 2,000 pounds for the four-cylinder model, versus 5,000 pounds for all the other 2010 4Runners.

Last year's 4Runner V-6 rated as low as 16/20 with 4WD--the improvements mainly attributed to revised gear ratios--and with the now-discontinued V-8 engine the 4Runner achieved just 14 mpg city, 17 highway.

A base Toyota Highlander--about the same size, and with the same size four-cylinder engine (though technically not the same unit)--weighs about 3,800 pounds and gets 20 mpg city, 27 highway.

In all, Toyota expects four-cylinder models to only make up about five percent of 2010 4Runner sales, nationwide, with total sales of 25,000 to 30,000. At one time, Toyota sold more than 100,000 4Runners per year.

Surprisingly, Toyota will only make the four-cylinder 4Runner available only in select markets. In California, where there's still a market for rear-wheel-drive sport-utility vehicles, Toyota plans to sell the vast majority of them; it will likely be offered more widely in Southern states but only special-order in Northern climes.

One thing's for sure: By getting into the four-cylinder market, Toyota has an engine option that's not offered in any of its rivals like the 2010 Nissan Pathfinder, 2010 Kia Borrego, or 2010 Ford Explorer.

Although V-6 versions of the 2010 Toyota 4Runner are already at dealerships, the four-cylinder model will be arriving this month or next. Stay tuned tomorrow as TheCarConnection.com brings you driving impressions of the brand-new 4Runner, and we'll update you on how the four-cylinder version stacks up as soon as we can get some seat time.

---------------------

High Gear Media has partnered with Tesla Motors on a new writing contest where YOU can win a tour and road test of the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport. You can submit as many articles as you like and enter multiple times.  Enter now!


 


Permalink:Toyota Not Planning On Many Takers For 4-Cylinder 4Runner

2010 Honda Ridgeline

The editors of TheCarConnection.com have driven the 2010 Honda Ridgeline and bring you impressions and details. In addition, TheCarConnection.com has studied a wide range of reviews covering the Ridgeline, to help you make the most informed choice and make sense of differing opinions.

Likes
Handling and maneuverability
Energetic, refined powertrain
Excellent safety
Comfortable ride

Dislikes
Odd styling isn't for everyone
Pricey relative to compact trucks
Bed is too small for some tasks

Although the Honda Ridgeline was coldly received when it was first introduced in 2005, the vehicle landscape has changed greatly since then. Many of the attributes that made the Ridgeline seem like an outsider at that time now add up to a more appealing choice for shoppers who want the comforts of the big trucks but don't need all their capability (or cumbersome handling).

Last year, Honda rehabilitated the Ridgeline with a host of slight improvements that affected its styling and driving demeanor, yielding a somewhat improved truck overall. Although the basic look is the same, a new grille, plus new headlights and tail lamps on the outside, and a revised appearance inside, all help give it a slightly more upscale feel. Still, to many, the Ridgeline's side silhouette is both its most memorable and maligned feature; the so-called machined billet styling--with no gap between the cab and bed, and the downward sloping bed wall--can come across as a little overwrought and busy. From the rear, the Ridgeline appears neat and tidy, but the odd new front fascia and grille--borrowing from the Pilot SUV's controversial look--don't do the design any favors. Inside, the Ridgeline has a more conventional, straightforward appearance--although the door panels are styled with hints of the exterior and have an awkward grab-handle arrangement.

The 2010 Honda Ridgeline has a single powertrain combination, which is unusual in the pickup market. With a 250-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 engine, a five-speed automatic transmission, and Variable Torque Management four-wheel drive, the Ridgeline has brisk acceleration and good passing response, even with a load, and it's better suited for slippery snow-covered roads than most four-wheel-drive pickups. Although the system isn't designed for serious off-roading, it includes a rear diff lock (VTM-4) mode for speeds of up to 18 mph. All the heavy-duty towing components are included; the Ridgeline can haul a 1,550-pound payload in its five-foot composite cargo bed or tow up to 5,000 pounds.

With a fully independent suspension, the 2010 Honda Ridgeline has a smoother ride and much better handling than other compact or mid-size trucks. Well-weighted steering helps the Ridgeline handle like the more car-oriented SUVs, with a great on-center feel, and it unwinds neatly coming out of corners. The Ridgeline doesn't bang and wiggle over bumps either, as many leaf-sprung pickups do, yet the suspension feels just as secure with a moderately full load as it does when empty, and it's relatively easy to hustle along on a curvy road.

There's only one body style, too. The Ridgeline is only offered in a crew-cab layout, with space for five. Front seats are supportive, if not that soft, but there's plenty of space, and in back two adults will fit just fine. The split-folding, tumble-forward rear seat has an integrated storage area for carrying smaller items securely, and if that's not enough, there's also a sealed 8.5-cubic-foot compartment within the cargo bed, good enough for a large cooler. The tailgate can also either open to the side or conventionally; it can support up to 300 pounds, even while moving; and it's designed to close with contaminates like sand or sawdust in between without damaging the setup. The downside is the cargo bed itself; at just over five feet long, it's not big but it will hold a 4-by-8 sheet of plywood with the tailgate down. An optional bed extender includes more tie-downs and can handle mounting accessories for ATVs, snowboards, surfboards, bikes, and the like.

The Ridgeline has been a longtime overachiever in safety, and that continues for 2010. Front side airbags, rollover-sensing side-curtain bags covering both rows, anti-lock brakes, and electronic stability control are included across the model line. The Ridgeline achieves top "good" ratings from the IIHS, and is one of just a few pickups getting the group's Top Safety Pick designation.

Three trims are now offered for the Ridgeline: RT, RTS, and RTL. The RT includes air conditioning, cruise control, a power-sliding rear window, and a 100-watt, six-speaker CD sound system. The mid-level RTS brings a refined appearance with machine-finished alloy wheels, body-colored door handles and mirrors, and privacy glass, plus an upgraded 160-watt sound system; at the top of the line, the RTL adds 18-inch wheels, fog lamps, a power moonroof, heated mirrors, and XM Satellite Radio. On the Element's options list are several features that aren't typically available with any but the largest pickups: a voice-recognition navigation system that includes Zagat restaurant information, an off-road tracking function, and a Bluetooth hands-free calling interface.

The Bottom Line:
The 2010 Honda Ridgeline is a more road-friendly solution for those who need occasionally heavy-hauling ability.

Other Choices:
If you like the 2010 Honda Ridgeline, also consider:

- Toyota Tacoma
- Nissan Frontier
- Suzuki Equator
- Ford Explorer Sport Trac
- Dodge Dakota

Reason Why:
The 2010 Honda Ridgeline is more refined and sophisticated than anything else this size with a pickup bed. And its body style is very different than anything else, which makes it tough to pick out direct rivals as they range through compact and mid-size trucks, most of which have more traditional layouts with burly frames and unforgiving leaf-spring rear suspensions. To its credit, the 2010 Ridgeline comes with all that's necessary to tow or haul its heaviest rated loads, and for any rivals that'll mean extra boxes to check. The Explorer Sport Trac is the closest in concept to the Ridgeline; it has a shorter bed, but there's an optional V-8 that outdoes the Ridgeline, at least for low-speed hauling. Even though the design is dated, it's still quite attractive. The Nissan Frontier and nearly identical Suzuki Equator are also possibilities; they're both especially rugged in look and feel and come in a variety of trims, including focused off-road models. Another possibility is the Dodge Dakota, but the Dakota doesn't ride or handle well. The Toyota Tacoma is probably the best choice for frugal shoppers, thanks to its strong resale value, as well as decent performance and fuel economy with the standard 2.7-liter four-cylinder engine.

Buying Tip
Watch out for dealer-installed options. They tend to add to the bottom-line price. Ask specifically for a no-options base truck and you'll be happy.


Permalink:2010 Honda Ridgeline

2010 Ford Edge

TheCarConnection.com has covered all the bases by looking to a wide range of review sources relevant to the 2010 Ford Edge. In addition to conveying information from those reports, TheCarConnection.com's editors have driven the Ford Edge and added some firsthand observations and insights to form a comprehensive review.

Likes
Two rows of comfortable seating
Responsive powertrain
Handling poise
Contemporary design still stands out

Dislikes
Somewhat plain inside
Lack of manual controls for the transmission
No EcoBoost engine option

The Ford Edge manages to look a little different in a class of vehicles that tend to all blur together. Like most newer so-called crossover designs, the 2010 Ford Edge rides and drives more like a car--a tall wagon--than a sport-utility vehicle, while its overall packaging is a good substitute for those who have moved on from an Explorer or Expedition. Ford has in recent years started its cars with an "F" and its trucks with an "E," but make no mistake, the Edge is very carlike in its performance.

From either the front or the side, the Edge's blunt nose and bright, overchromed grille are the dominant design features. Otherwise, the smoothly arched roofline and tasteful, understated rear details combine for one of the more attractive crossover profiles. Inside, the 2010 Edge feels a lot more straightforward and traditional. Materials and surfaces don't quite match the best ones Ford has applied recently in other models, but the upright seating position and an instrument panel that's more like a sport sedan's than an SUV's are both positives.

A 3.5-liter, 265-horsepower V-6 engine and six-speed automatic transmission are offered across the 2010 Ford Edge lineup, and power is delivered by either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive. The combination has plenty of power to move the Edge briskly, even with a full load or on steep hills, but it still doesn't come with the manual controls that are the sign of a vehicle with sporting intentions. Nevertheless, the Edge is surprisingly entertaining to drive, with responsive handling and a suspension that's tuned just firmly enough for crisp handling without sacrificing ride quality.

The 2010 Ford Edge becomes more fuel-efficient, with fuel-economy improvements of up to 2 mpg versus last year. EPA ratings now stand at 18 mpg city, 25 highway for the front-wheel-drive version.

Keep in mind that while many other models of the Edge's general size have third-row seating, the Edge has two rows and seating for five. But all five seating positions are ample for adults. Front seats are generous and supportive, while in back the bench seat is split 60/40 to fold forward or recline slightly. When folded, the backseats provide a level load floor, and with the front passenger seat folded the Edge can accommodate items up to eight feet long. However, the sloping rear window restricts the cargo area a bit. Each rear seat can also be folded manually using an industry-first single-hand release or automatically with an available EasyFold electro-mechanical remote release accessible from the rear cargo area.

Standard safety equipment includes AdvanceTrac with Roll Stability Control, anti-lock brakes, front-seat side airbags, and side-curtain airbags. The 2010 Ford Edge gets top scores across nearly all of the federal-government and insurance-industry crash tests, and it has been an IIHS Top Safety Pick.

Standout features available on the 2010 Ford Edge include Ford's SYNC system for controlling entertainment and communication systems, a voice-activated navigation system, and a new, large, panorama-style Vista Roof. A power liftgate is optional, as are 20-inch chromed wheels and brassy red-trimmed front seats. New last year was Sirius Travel Link, a useful optional feature that provides real-time traffic and weather information, as well as current gas prices at nearby gas stations.

The Bottom Line: If you don't require a third-row seat, the 2010 Ford Edge remains a satisfying alternative in the crowded pack of mid-size crossovers.

Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Ford Edge, also consider:

- Hyundai Veracruz
- Mazda CX-9
- Nissan Murano
- Toyota Highlander
- Subaru Tribeca

Reason Why:
Unlike most of its similar-size competitors, the 2010 Ford Edge doesn't have an available third row of seating. But its interior is a more comfortable place for four (or up to five) than several of its competitors, especially the Murano and Tribeca. The slight interior improvements and new SYNC system introduced on the '08 Edge help make the Ford more competitive against top peers such as the Highlander. Relative to the Edge, the Tribeca and CX-9 are a little sportier on the road, with a slightly firmer suspension setting and crisper handling, while the Highlander and Veracruz have styling that's less exciting and possibly less offensive. Premium fuel is recommended for several of the Edge's competitors, but cheaper 87-octane fuel is fine for the Edge. The Mazda CX-9 is a rival to the Edge, which has a slightly sportier character, but the two share mechanical underpinnings.

Buying Tip:
Don't buy a 2010 Ford Edge thinking you can take it off-road. Ford makes no promises, and the focus of the Edge is on-road performance.


Permalink:2010 Ford Edge

2010 Ford Escape

In order to bring you the most useful hands-on road test, TheCarConnection.com has driven several different variations of the Escape and report on it here in this Bottom Line. Then TheCarConnection.com's team of experts read reviews pertaining to the 2010 Escape, bringing you additional pros and cons, as well as opposing viewpoints.

Likes
Responsive six-speed automatic transmission
Reasonably good fuel economy (four-cylinder)
Class-leading tech options
Good roster of safety features

Dislikes
Overall lack of refinement
Sometimes choppy ride
Uncomfortable backseat

The 2010 Ford Escape is proof that shoppers shouldn't always go with first impressions. Although many might be turned off by the Escape's boxy, traditional design that looks a bit like a 7/8-scale Ford Explorer, the Escape includes car-based underpinnings and Ford has in recent years done a good job in keeping the Escape's feature set and driving experience quite modern.

For 2008, Ford gave the Escape a modest facelift that vastly improved the interior look and feel, while just last year the Escape got a new lineup of powertrains--including a more powerful and fuel-efficient four-cylinder engine and a much mightier optional V-6. Both engines are carried through to 2010. Most drivers will do just fine with the base 171-hp, 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, provided they don't often haul heavy loads or plan to tow; it's smoother than the previous four-cylinder. The V-6 Escape has more than adequate pep, though the engine doesn't feel as refined as most rival V-6s.

Either engine responds well with the six-speed automatic transmission; four-cylinder buyers also have a five-speed manual gearbox to choose from. The four-cylinder with the five-speed returns 22 mpg city, 28 highway, while the V-6 rates up to 18 mpg city, 26 highway, though TheCarConnection.com's editors have observed lower figures with the V-6.

For those who place fuel economy or petroleum independence as one of their highest shopping priorities, there's the 2010 Ford Escape Hybrid, which returns fuel economy figures of up to 34 mpg city, 31 highway. The Hybrid is covered by a separate review.

Again, while the 2010 Ford Escape looks like a traditional, truck-based SUV from a distance, the Escape isn't quite up to the task of real off-roading. On-demand four-wheel drive is offered, which makes the Escape capable enough for gravel roads, deep snow, and such. With either drive system, the Escape's on-road handling manners are superb, thanks to a completely retuned suspension featuring new struts, shock absorbers, and sway bars.

Inside, the 2010 Ford Escape offers a higher seating position all around compared to other more modern-looking crossover vehicles--a feature some shorter drivers might appreciate. The front seats are comfortable, but the back seats are a bit hard, with short cushions that most adults won't love for long trips. Folding the backseats for cargo is also way more complicated than it should be, and it involves individually pulling out each headrest. Overall packaging is the one area where the 2010 Escape shows its age; despite the fact that the Escape is such a tall vehicle, the cabin might feel a bit short on headroom for taller drivers, while the floor is higher than that of more modern designs. The Escape's materials look good up close--they were updated for '08--and the blue-green instrument lighting is extremely easy to read.

The Ford Escape performs well in crash tests and is anticipated to be a Top Safety Pick from the Institute for Highway Safety again for 2010. The SUV also earns five stars for front and side impacts from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Dual-stage front airbags and side airbags are included, along with anti-lock brakes and electronic stability control. Integrated Spotter Mirrors are a new feature for 2010 and aid visibility in the driver's blind spot. Also available is a new Rear View Camera system, along with a new Active Park System that helps guide the driver into a feasible space. Active Park Assist includes a new feature called Pull-Drift Compensation, which helps adapt to crosswinds or odd road curvature. Parents with teen drivers might also appreciate the new programmable MyKey system, which allows limits to top speed and radio volume, also adding speed alert chimes.

The 2010 Ford Escape, along with the rest of the Ford lineup, still offers one of the best interface systems for hands-free phones; the so-called SYNC system connects easily to almost any Bluetooth-enabled or USB device and is driven via simple voice commands. Sirius Travel Link, another option, provides navigation, plus real-time traffic, weather, and fuel prices among other features, and can be easily controlled by voice commands. The 2010 Escape still doesn't offer a backseat DVD player, an extra often sought by busy families, but it offers a host of other extras like upgraded audio with steering-wheel controls, upgraded leather upholstery, and an ambient lighting system.

The Bottom Line: Don't let the 2010 Ford Escape's boxy, old-school appearance turn you off; the Escape is a solid, fuel-efficient choice for city-dwelling families.

Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Ford Escape, also consider:

- Subaru Forester
- Honda CR-V
- Hyundai Tucson
- Nissan Rogue
- Chevrolet Equinox

Reason Why
Don't get penned in by the Escape's conservative look; it competes head-on with a variety of compact crossovers, some of which are sleek and rakish. One of those is the Nissan Rogue. The Rogue doesn't even pretend to be tough or off-road-worthy; it's a tall wagon, with space for five, good ride quality, and a fuel-efficient four-cylinder powertrain. The Hyundai Tucson looks a little more carlike than the Escape, but it's one of the least refined in the group; it's due for a complete redesign later this year. The Honda CR-V is one of our all-time favorites, if you only look at the driving experience, but some people have a hard time getting past the SUV's styling and the lack of optional V-6 power. Subaru's Forester became significantly larger for 2009, and it's now a roomier alternative to the Escape, with a nice, smooth ride and responsive handling. Finally, the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox has been redesigned and is now a much better vehicle than before, with a vastly improved interior, plus a smooth, economical four-cylinder base engine and six-speed automatic transmission.

Buying Tip:
You might get a better experience at the Lincoln-Mercury dealership, so don't forget about the nearly identical 2010 Mercury Mariner.


Permalink:2010 Ford Escape