Kia Teases Racier Look For 2011 Optima, Ahead Of NY Show
The Kia Optima, in its current or past iterations, has never been much of a looker, but that appears about to change. With this New York Auto Show concept teased here in these photos, Kia shows that it's taking a completely new design direction with its upcoming, all-new 2011 Kia Optima.
The new concept shows a further evolution of the design direction that Kia has been following under design chief Peter Schreyer (formerly of Audi and Volkswagen), with some design themes that look Audi-like from some angles (especially from the side and rear) combined with details that we're now beginning to see as distinctly Kia—like the grille that's pinched in front, the swept-back headlights, and the prominent fog lamps in front.
No word yet on whether Kia, like Hyundai, will go with an all-four-cylinder lineup for the Optima this time. Although the two brands share the same parent company in South Korea, along with some of the same suppliers and facilities, Kia has managed to stay quite distinct and is trying to take a sportier, more enthusiast-flavored angle in the U.S. market.
Up until now, the Optima has been a half-step smaller than other mainstream sedans like the Honda Accord or Toyota Camry. Kia hasn't released specs yet on the Optima, though it does say that the new model will be longer, lower, and wider than the previous model—likely placing it more in line with those other sedans—with a significant boost in wheelbase for a roomier interior and more cargo space.
2010 Mitsubishi Galant Bottom Line
Here in this Bottom Line covering the 2010 Mitsubishi Galant, the editors of TheCarConnection.com bring you driving impressions and an expert take on how the Galant matches up against other mid-size sedans. To give you an even more comprehensive take, TheCarConnection.com has also read a range of reviews on the Galant and bring you excerpts in a full review.
Likes
Backseat space
Smooth ride
Standard safety features
Dislikes
Outdated look and feel
Inferior cabin materials
Engine is noisier than rival four-cylinders
The 2010 Mitsubishi Galant limps on for another year, with its lineup quite dramatically cut. V-6 models, along with the performance Ralliart model, have been dropped from the lineup, leaving only four-cylinder ES and SE models of this mid-size sedan.
Although the Galant has seen a number of minor refreshes over the years, it's been carried over for the most part since its last major redesign, for 2004. With most mid-size sedans seeing one (some two) redesigns since then, it feels a little outdated from a style standpoint, to put it nicely. Last year Mitsubishi gave it a new lower grille mesh on all ES trim levels, which has now been expanded to both models. Inside, the Galant has weathered the storms of time much better, and aside from feeling a little drab, the design still appears attractive, if not a little basic.
If you don't expect a lot out of the driving experience, the Galant will reward you with well-rounded competence. The sole engine in the 2010 Mitsubishi Galant is the 160-horsepower 2.4-liter four-cylinder, with a four-speed automatic transmission. The available V-6 and five-speed automatic of previous years is gone. With the four, the Galant is generally pleasant to drive, provided you don't push it too hard. On all versions, the steering is nicely weighted, brake modulation good, and pedal travel short. Fuel economy is respectable, too, at 20 mpg city, 27 highway.
The interior, if you can get past the somewhat drab, low-rent appearance up close, is roomy and comfortable. The front seats have plenty of room, and so do the deeply set backseats. One definite miss is that the rear seatback doesn't fold forward—there's only a pass-through. The soft suspension tuning absorbs most road impacts well, and there's plenty of insulation from road and wind noise, though the engine can get noisy up steep grades or during passing. Most notably, the interior is covered in industrial-looking trim, and in general, the dark, plastic-addicted cabin needs a richer look and feel.
Anti-lock brakes, dual-stage front airbags, front seat-mounted side-impact airbags, and side front and rear curtain airbags are all now standard on the 2010 Mitsubishi Galant, along with electronic stability control. The federal government rates the Galant with four stars for rollover protection, but other ratings have not been revealed.
The Galant has been reconfigured in recent years to offer a lot of features for the money. Base 2010 Mitsubishi Galant ES models come with most popular features like cruise control, air conditioning, keyless entry, and a 140-watt, six-speaker sound system, while SE models add automatic climate control, heated seats, hands-free Bluetooth, and a Rockford Fosgate audio system, plus lots of equipment that make the Galant SE look, if not feel, sportier, such as larger alloy wheels, a spoiler, and fog lamps. The former Navigation and Rearview Camera Package has now been rolled into the SE's list of features, leaving no significant factory options.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Mitsubishi Galant is adequate in most respects—and surprisingly comfortable. But it's not exciting or class-leading in any way.
Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Mitsubishi Galant, also consider:
- Kia Optima
- Nissan Altima
- Honda Accord
- Chevrolet Malibu
Reason Why:
One of the Mitsubishi Galant's top rivals is the Kia Optima. Like the Galant, the Optima doesn't possess a lot of personality, but it's thoroughly competent. Both vehicles place an emphasis on ride quality above driving dynamics. The Chevrolet Malibu is an option that feels positively lavish next to the Galant, with a strong V-6 or four-cylinder and a beautiful, refined interior. The Honda Accord remains at the top of the class, especially for those who value interior appointments and a premium, luxurious feel. And for those who enjoy driving a bit more, the Nissan Altima has a sportier feel, with more overt styling and better handling.
Buying Tip
With '09 Galants still available at the time of writing, there will likely be very few 2010 Mitsubishi Galants. You might be better off just getting thousands of dollars off a 2009.
| Permalink:2010 Mitsubishi Galant Bottom Line |  |
2010 Kia Rondo Bottom Line
In order to bring you this comprehensive Bottom Line summary of the 2010 Kia Rondo, the editors of TheCarConnection.com have driven the Rondo and report on how it drives and stacks up to other people-movers. Then to give you the most information for an informed purchase decision, TheCarConnection.com has read a range of other reviews, bringing you highlights in the adjacent Full Review.
Likes
Unbelievably spacious interior
Bargain price
Overall refinement
Fuel efficiency
Dislikes
Exterior styling definitely isn't for everyone
Skimpy front seats
Lacks tech options like Bluetooth
Whether you see it as an interesting alternative to the traditional minivan or a tall-roof hatchback or wagon, the 2010 Kia Rondo remains a unique vehicle in the market. With an unbelievably roomy, minivan-like interior layout—in five- or seven-passenger seating—paired with backdoors that are hinged, not sliding, the 2010 Kia Rondo is definitely a little weird-looking but redeems itself for a number of reasons.
The Rondo is built for room, not for sex appeal, with its tall, bulbous profile and five-door configuration eking three available rows of seating out of a footprint that's barely larger than that of a compact car. From some angles the Rondo appears downright awkward, but the rounded silhouette looks reasonably attractive, thanks to its overall simplicity and lack of gimmicky details. Inside, too, the emphasis is on functionality, with an unremarkable instrument panel design that locates the shifter at the bottom, not as part of the center console.
The 2010 Kia Rondo certainly won't win any drag races. Powertrain options remain a 175-horsepower, 2.4-liter four-cylinder or 192-hp, 2.7-liter V-6. Between the two, there's very little difference in actual thrust, so we recommend the more affordable four-cylinder engine, which is smooth and slightly more fuel-efficient. Both engines are paired with an automatic transmission that shifts smoothly and comes with a +/- shift gate for manual control. Maneuverability is very impressive in the Rondo, and it's especially easy to park, but it doesn't handle with the sharpness of the better minivans or sport wagons.
Moving people and their stuff around in relative comfort is what the 2010 Kia Rondo does best; although a third row of seating is available, it's designed for children, not adults. Overall, the seating arrangement is fuss-free and helps maximize space, with the second row sliding fore and aft for better access to the third row or a better balance of legroom between rows. Storage space hasn't been forgotten either; there are lots of small cubbies, along with an impressive recessed tray below the cargo floor. The materials used in the Rondo aren't that impressive—they're definitely of the type you'd see in a cut-rate small car—but it feels well put-together and has a smooth ride, free from excess road or wind noise.
The Rondo comes with a good set of standard safety features, including electronic stability control and four-wheel anti-lock disc brakes, plus front side and full-length head-curtain airbags. Safety features are quite good, too. In federal tests, the Rondo earns five stars for frontal impact and four- and five-star results for side and rear impact.
Value for the money is a strong reason to consider the 2010 Rondo, which has one of the better new-car warranties and a strong list of standard features. Kia's coverage ranges up to 10 years or 100,000 miles on powertrain and 5 years/50,000 miles on almost everything else. Even at the base level, the Rondo comes with power windows, locks, and mirrors, and the LX adds air conditioning and a roof rack, among other features. Third-row seating is included with the top-of-the-line EX, which also gets 17-inch alloy wheels, plus fog lamps, upgraded upholstery, keyless entry, and an upgraded sound system.
The Bottom Line: You likely won't be drawn to the 2010 Kia Rondo because of its looks, but you're likely to see it in a different light if you do your research first.
Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Kia Rondo, also consider:
- Mazda5
- Toyota Venza
- Scion xB
- Chrysler PT Cruiser
- Chevrolet HHR
Reason Why:
There are few small people-movers in the U.S. market, but nothing quite like the 2010 Kia Rondo. The closest offering is the Mazda5, which has sliding doors and looks a little more like a compact minivan. But you're bound for surprise once you get behind the wheel of the "5"—it's a lot peppier and fun to drive, especially with the manual transmission. The Rondo leaves a more conservative impression, with a dowdy appearance matched with a more comfortable and quieter interior, plus a more easily reconfigurable space. The Chevrolet HHR and Chrysler PT Cruiser are other alternatives; both offer retro styling and flexible cargo arrangements, but neither has a third-row seat. The boxy exterior of the latest generation of the Scion xB somehow doesn't translate to much interior space, though it is attractive and fuel-efficient. If you want to go larger, you might take a look at the base four-cylinder version of the Toyota Venza. It's not significantly larger for interior space but it feels like a more substantial vehicle, and it includes a more richly appointed interior.
Buying Tip
The Kia Rondo has not been much of a sales success in the United States, and it's likely been overshadowed by the hip (and significantly smaller) Soul.
| Permalink:2010 Kia Rondo Bottom Line | |
GM Gives The Feds An Early Holiday Gift: $140 Million
Just last week, General Motors announced plans to speed up repayment of billions in loans from the U.S. government. Technically, the company's fast-track, $1 billion-per-quarter payback schedule doesn't kick in until December, but GM is getting a head start on things by returning $140 million right now. The cash comes from a $2.5 billion loan GM was given to pay suppliers, though we're not entirely sure how much of that -- if any -- is included in the $6.7 billion GM owes the U.S. government. GM credits the repayment to shrinking demand from suppliers and the company's improved bottom line. For us, however, the bottom line is that the money's hard to follow. [DetNews]
| Permalink:GM Gives The Feds An Early Holiday Gift: $140 Million |  |
BMW Pushing For Smart Traffic Lights To Aid Fuel Efficiency
Creeping along from red light to red light on your way from a major sports event or concert, or stopped by every red light on the way home late at night, on empty roads, you've probably wondered why traffic lights in the U.S. aren't a little more adaptable.
The short answer: they're not at all smart, and at least here in the U.S. they're horribly outdated. The typical U.S. traffic signaling system is (sorry, fellow GenXers) 30 to 40 years old. And the result of these inflexible geezers signaling traffic is a lot of needless idling and the lack of easy adaptability in most cases to either sudden events like traffic accidents or even daily events like traffic congestion in a certain direction at a particular time.
Vehicle miles traveled have grown in recent years 15 percent faster than our country's roadway network itself. And congestion keeps getting worse, leading to increased fuel consumption and increased emissions--plus growing economic consequences.
Developments like start-stop systems, which shut off the engine when sitting still in traffic, along with full hybrid systems that help increase fuel efficiency especially in low-speed stop-and-go traffic can help, but they're only part of the solution. That's why BMW is pushing for upgraded, smart traffic signals that would have the capability to adapt to traffic congestion, whether it's expected or not.
"Today the traffic lights have very limited detection abilities," says Dirk Kessler, the department manager for the BMW's Traffic Technology and Traffic Management group. Even the smarter signals today, Kessler says, have one or two sets of loop detectors capable of measuring queue lengths, average speeds, and number of cars. In the U.S. there's almost nothing in signals that's traffic-dependent," he says. "We think there's a lot of work to do."
Traffic signals have been one of the initial research subjects for the group. In its initial research, the group studied so-called Green Waves--a minimum of four signals in sequence that can eb synchronized for better traffic flow. Simply by changing the timing of traffic lights on a test stretch of roadway in Munich, the engineers were able to nearly double the fuel efficiency of a BMW 530d test vehicle--from 22 mpg to 42 mpg. That being an idealized situation, the company expects an overall 10 to 15 percent decrease in urban fuel consumption due to smart traffic signaling. Considering that motor vehicles use about 175 million gallons of fuel annually, and urban areas make up a significant chunk of miles traveled, that's a tremendous potential improvement.
It's in automakers' interest to advocate for improvements like this, Kessler said, because the investment is small compared to the investment required for incremental improvements in fuel economy for new vehicles. "Think about the money that's being spent to save one, two percent...and with a relatively small investment you could save much more," he says. "There is no witchcraft, there is only a bit of engineering,"
BMW has been meeting with U.S. DOT officials on the importance of upgraded traffic signals--hoping for a new focus on improving them--and will share results of their Green Wave studies with interested groups in the U.S. Although BMW hasn't yet examined how smarter signals would affect safety, it's likely that it would bring a significant improvement.
And this is all without talking about any communication between the cars themselves and traffic signaling. Broader-scope traffic management and car-to-network-to-car communication is the long range hope, which we'll bring you more on in an upcoming post.
| Permalink:BMW Pushing For Smart Traffic Lights To Aid Fuel Efficiency | |
2010 Hyundai Azera
The editors at TheCarConnection.com have driven the Hyundai Azera, along with all of its full-size sedan rivals, in a variety of situations so as to bring readers a full assessment of how it measures up. And to bring you the most complete picture of how the 2010 Hyundai Azera fits into the market and who it appeals to, TheCarConnection.com has included excerpts from a wide range of reviews.
Likes
Sheer value for the money
Vast backseat
Strong acceleration
Tactile feel of controls
Dislikes
Very bland styling
Soft but bouncy ride
Unimpressive fuel economy
Unremarkable for safety
The front-wheel-drive Hyundai Azera is a car with a very focused mission, but it takes its reason for being to an extreme. It's pretty much catered perfectly to those who value ride over handling, and interior space over flashy design; with GM trying to change Buick's image in the United States to make it more youthful, the Azera seems to be occupying that brand's geriatric portion of the market--appealing to penny-pinching empty-nesters who want a big, comfortable highway cruiser.
Conservative but tasteful is a good way to sum up the styling of the Azera. Wheel designs have been updated, and last year marked the introduction of a new chrome grille design; on the inside, the wood grain and metal accents have been enhanced a bit.
There are two Azera models, both powered by V-6 engines; a 3.3-liter V-6, making 234 horsepower, moves the base GLS, while the Limited gets a 263-hp, 3.8-liter V-6. Both engines have all-aluminum construction, continuously variable valve timing, and a variable intake system. Compared to the V-6 engines that Kia used just a few years ago, they're thoroughly modern and refined. Fuel economy is decent for a large sedan, at 18 mpg city, 26 highway for the GLS and 16/26 mpg for the Limited.
The 2010 Hyundai Azera driving experience is, in a word, numbing. Steering is light, brakes are somewhat overboosted, and there's no real feel of the road surface yet lots of soft body motion. Because of how softly sprung the Azera is, considering its size and weight you might detect its limitations when angling around a tight low-speed corner. The five-speed automatic transmission comes with Shiftronic manual control, but you probably won't find yourself inspired to race through canyons and over ridges.
Very ample overall dimensions directly translate to very ample interior space in the 2010 Azera. Fortunately, the large size means that the Azera has an impressive 44 inches of front-seat legroom and more than 38 inches of legroom for rear-seat passengers--as much as (or more than) some traditional-brand luxury cars that can cost twice as much. Azera models that TheCarConnection.com has seen in previous years suffered from unimpressive assembly and some trim issues, but the materials are right up there with those of other large non-luxury sedans.
The list of safety features is impressive; eight airbags, plus active head restraints, electronic stability control, and anti-lock brakes with Brake Assist are all included. Yet crash-test protection hasn't been at the top of the class. The Azera earns four-star front impact crash protection and five-star ratings for driver-side impact protection, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), but ratings from the IIHS include a "good" designation only in frontal offset impact and "acceptable" in side and rear tests.
Even base GLS models of the Azera come pretty well equipped, with a six-speaker AM/FM/CD/MP3 audio system, iPod/USB inputs, an electrochromatic mirror with compass, HomeLink garage door opener, and power driver and passenger seats. The Premium package on the GLS includes leather heated seats and a sunroof, while top-of-the-line Limited models get 17-inch alloy wheels, leather seats, heated front seats, wood trim, a power rear sunshade, a sunroof, and an Infinity audio system. For 2010, Hyundai presents the Limited model as an even bigger step up in luxury from the base GLS, with the standard feature set now including a power tilt/telescope wheel, integrated memory system, and wood grain steering wheel and door pulls.
On the Limited, the options are confined to a new 605-watt Infinity Logic 7 sound system, paired in one of two option packages with power-adjustable pedals, rain-sensing wipers, memory seats, and for the costlier package, an LG navigation system. A Bluetooth hands-free interface remains available only as a port-installed option.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Hyundai Azera appeals to sedan shoppers on a budget who value comfort and interior space above all else.
Other Choices:
If you like the 2010 Hyundai Azera, also consider:
- Toyota Avalon
- Buick LaCrosse
- Ford Taurus
- Chevrolet Impala
- Kia Amanti
Reason Why:
For shoppers looking for this type of car, ride comfort, a quiet cabin, and more traditional luxury features rank above all else. The Toyota Avalon is probably the Azera's top rival; it has an enviable reputation for quality and strikes a slightly better compromise between ride and handling. Then there's the all-new Buick LaCrosse, which steps away from absolute comfort toward a slightly sportier character overall. The Buick also offers more tech features in addition to those traditional luxury-sedan extras. The Ford Taurus rides quite well and, with a 2010 redesign, has become more of a performance sedan, but it's still comfortable inside. Those planning to carry adults in the backseat should be aware that Ford reduced rear headroom in redesigning the Taurus. The Chevrolet Impala is another alternative, but the Impala feels decidedly behind the times, with decade-ago levels of refinement and obsolete-looking interior appointments. Then there's the Kia Amanti; compared to the Azera, the Kia is a little less ornate-feeling inside; it's about the same size as the Azera, has a comparably smooth ride, and is worth a look.
Buying Tip
Although we have no experience with the Bluetooth hands-free system offered in the Azera, it's only offered as a port-installed option. Such systems are usually poorly integrated, so we'd recommend you test a car with it, at freeway speeds, before deciding between that and an aftermarket alternative.
| Permalink:2010 Hyundai Azera | |
2010 Hyundai Sonata
So that you're better able to compare the 2010 Hyundai Sonata with other vehicles in its class, the editors of TheCarConnection.com have driven the Sonata and compiled an authoritative Bottom Line that uses firsthand observations and impressions. Then TheCarConnection.com assembled a comprehensive full review with excerpts from other respected sources from around the Web.
Likes
Smooth four-cylinder engine
Upscale look and feel of interior
Reasonably handsome exterior
Strong warranty
Dislikes
Doesn't steer as well as rivals
Flat-feeling seats
Fussy Bluetooth integration
Although the 2010 Hyundai Sonata still hangs in the second echelon of mid-size sedans, after well-known nameplates like the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry, there's no reason why it shouldn't be compared directly with those mainstays. The Sonata is an excellent package with well-coordinated styling, a spacious interior, and the usual choice of four-cylinder or V-6 engines. After a comprehensive mid-cycle refresh last year that included a new four-cylinder engine, a substantially redesigned interior, and an update of available tech features, the Sonata carries into 2010 with no significant changes.
Last year the Sonata got a light touch-up at the front and rear, with most of the sedan's sheetmetal carried over; that's fine as the Sonata is nicely proportioned, if a bit conservative. The Sonata gained a new interior last year, most notably refinished in soft-touch plastics and padded surfaces, with a matte-metallic finish that's comparable to what's used in Lexus vehicles and Hyundai's upscale Genesis. Overall, the feel is surprisingly sophisticated, though there are still a few hard finishes in places.
The 2010 Hyundai Sonata lineup is somewhat abbreviated compared with previous model years; the V-6 is no longer offered with the base GLS. Sporty SE and upscale Limited trims are still available with the four or the V-6. The 2.4-liter, 175-horsepower four-cylinder engine comes with with a five-speed manual or a five-speed automatic, but you'll be hard-pressed to find a stick. That's fine, as the four works just fine with the automatic; it's smooth in everyday driving with just enough torque for comfortable passing. The available 249-hp, 3.3-liter V-6 isn't that much quicker, with the Sonata feeling significantly heavier with this engine. Fuel economy ranges from 21/31 mpg for the four to 19/28 mpg with the six. Handling isn't quite as responsive and nicely weighted as you might find in the Mazda6 and Ford Fusion, but for ride and handling it does compare with the base Honda Accord and Toyota Camry models. Sporty SE models still manage an absorbent ride.
Ever since this generation of Sonata made its debut in 2006, interior space has been significantly better relative to other mid-size sedans. The front seats in any of the versions are quite comfortable but a bit flat, while in terms of backseat space the 2010 Sonata qualifies as a large car, like the Honda Accord, with the backseat contoured just right. Interior appointments in general feel high quality, with plenty of padded surfaces, and doors open and close with a solid sound. The high-mounted radio and climate controls are easy to use, and cup holders and storage abound.
The Hyundai Sonata earns five stars for front and side-impact safety from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), while the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) calls it "acceptable" for side impacts.
Electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes, and side curtain airbags are included across the model line.
You don't need to step up beyond the base 2010 Hyundai Sonata GLS to get a well-equipped car. The GLS offers an AM/FM/XM/CD/MP3 audio with USB and auxiliary jacks, air conditioning, cruise control, and a tilt steering wheel. A spoiler, 17-inch wheels, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, a power driver seat, and steering-wheel audio controls are all part of the sporty SE. The Limited gets a multidisc CD changer, a subwoofer/amplifier, and heated front seats. A sunroof and a navigation system are available, and the Sonata now offers an Infinity premium audio system. One area that disappoints is the low-rent Bluetooth interface on the GLS, which is mounted like a speakerphone on the headliner. No matter which model you choose, the warranty coverage is very strong: five years or 50,000 miles basic, and ten years or 100,000 miles on the powertrain.
The Bottom Line: The refined and roomy 2010 Hyundai Sonata lands solidly in the middle of a crowded field of mid-size family sedans, with just a little more value for the money than most of the rest.
Other Choices
If you're interested in the 2010 Hyundai Sonata, also consider:
- Chevrolet Malibu
- Ford Fusion
- Honda Accord
- Nissan Altima
- Toyota Camry
Reason Why:
The mid-size sedan field has long been ruled by the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord, though the Camry no longer has the top-notch reliability and build quality it once did, and the Honda Accord has gone off in left field in terms of styling. Meanwhile, the Nissan Altima is an exceptional large sedan, with responsive handling and sporty styling to match; however, it has less space overall than the Sonata, and its CVT automatic is a less appealing combination than the Sonata's four-cylinder and five-speed automatic. The Chevrolet Malibu is just as roomy as the Sonata, with a very comfortable ride and well-appointed interior, though its four-cylinder engine isn't quite as smooth and quiet. The Ford Fusion is a slight step smaller than the rest but feels much sportier overall.
Buying Tip
If you like the 2010 Hyundai Sonata, you might be able to swing a deal toward the end of the model year; for 2011 an all-new Sonata is on the way, and a Hybrid version will follow shortly thereafter.
| Permalink:2010 Hyundai Sonata | |
2010 GMC Canyon
TheCarConnection.com has driven the GMC Canyon, including the V-8 models, and bring you their driving impressions and other observations in this Bottom Line. TheCarConnection.com's team of writers has also researched a range of reviews covering the 2010 GMC Canyon by some of the most respected review sources on the Web.
Likes
Powerful and smooth V-8
Multiple body styles and configurations
Fuel-efficient four-cylinder/manual option
Genuine compact truck in short-bed form
Dislikes
Handling/roadholding
Agricultural four and five-cylinder engines
Poor interior plastics
Longest bed is only six feet
The GMC Canyon and its Chevrolet Colorado sibling went on sale six years ago as replacements for the Sonoma and S-10. Ideal for those who desire a small, capable pickup that is maneuverable and fuel efficient, the 2010 GMC Canyon provides a good alternative to full-size pickups and comes with a range of different body styles and drivetrain options.
Nearly identical to the Chevrolet Colorado--though arguable slightly better-looking than the Colorado, in the opinion of TheCarConnection.com--the Canyon is available in regular and extended-cab configurations with a six-foot bed, and as a crew cab with a five-foot bed.
All models come in either two- or four-wheel drive with either the Z85 standard suspension or the Z71 off-road setup. Last year, the special ZQ8 sport suspension was only available on two-wheel-drive extended- and crew-cab models with the 5.3-liter V-8 engine, but for 2010 the ZQ8 Sport Suspension package is now available on two-wheel-drive extended- and crew-cab SLE-1 and SLT variants, both of which utilize 2.9-liter four-cylinder engines.
As previously reported, the carried-over V-8 engine still outputs 300 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque, accelerates the vehicle from zero to 60 mph in less than seven seconds, and can tow up to 6,000 pounds. All that grunt gives the 2010 GMC Canyon a relaxed but still torquey driving experience, and it's powerful enough to make takeoffs at stoplights seem like you're in a muscle car.
The V-8 joins the returning 2.9-liter inline four-cylinder and 3.7-liter inline five-cylinder engines that got a revised fuel control module last year to improve fuel economy. The 185-horsepower four-cylinder now gets ratings of up to 25 mpg highway, while the 242-horsepower five-cylinder musters an EPA-rated 15/20 mpg highway/city fuel economy with the automatic transmission. Unfortunately, the smaller engines in the 2010 Canyon tend to be a little noisier and less refined than we'd like, especially considering that other budget pickups such as the Toyota Tacoma and Ford Ranger don't suffer from this same problem.
Once again electronic stability control is standard across the lineup, and the fortified brakes from last year make a return. While power and braking in the 2010 Canyon are adequate, handling remains a weak point; it feels vague and hesitant to unwind on twisty roads. It also tends to require frequent adjustments on the highway.
Inside the cabin of the 2010 Canyon is where things begin to unravel a little. Cursed with unrefined switchgear and cheap plastic, the Canyon highlights itself as a good work truck rather than anything else. On the upside, the Canyon has what will probably please serious buyers most: a simple, straightforward instrument panel layout, with push-button controls for the 4WD system mounted high. And front seats, though flat-feeling, provide a good driving position, while in the back on Crew Cab models there's plenty of space for two adults or three kids. It is, however, important to note that that four-door Canyons have only a 5-foot, 1-inch bed, and the 6-foot "long" bed on two-door models won't fit the standard 4x8 sheet of plywood flat.
Air conditioning comes as standard, as well as a tilt steering wheel, cruise control, and folding exterior mirrors. Options such as traction control, XM, fog lamps, leather seats, a sunroof, a six-CD changer, and a sliding rear window are available. OnStar is offered, but there's no navigation system--a necessity these days for work trucks. For 2010, three new exterior colors are available: Merlot Jewel Metallic, Gray Green Metallic, and Pure Silver Metallic.
In terms of safety, the four-door GMC Canyon is the pick of the bunch, receiving five-star crash scores, while other versions get four stars. GMC picks up head curtain side airbags as standard on all 2010 Canyon models, which should improve safety. The addition of standard StabiliTrack electronic stability control also gets a tick in our books.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 GMC Canyon returns with its powerful V-8, more safety features, and new exterior colors, but a cheap interior remains a letdown.
Other Choices
If you like the 2010 GMC Canyon, also consider:
- Ford Ranger
- Chevrolet Colorado
- Toyota Tacoma
- Nissan Frontier
- Dodge Dakota
Reason Why:
The Chevrolet Colorado is very close to the Canyon in almost every aspect--except for unique grilles and subtle variations in badging and trim. The Ford Ranger reigns as the strongest competitor to the Canyon and Colorado; the Ranger is an aging design, but at the four-cylinder level it's more enjoyable to drive than the GM twins and gets decent fuel economy. The Ranger also comes in a wide range of configurations--including strong V-6 versions, although it doesn't compete with the new V-8. The Toyota Tacoma is a step larger, but it gives the Canyon a run for the money, as its base price is more than $1,000 lower, with strong, smooth performance from its standard four-cylinder engine and hearty, competitive hauling power from its optional V-6. The Tacoma also has especially solid resale value. The Nissan Frontier feels larger, though it comes with a base four-cylinder engine as well or an exceptionally torquey and smooth 3.5-liter V-6. The Dakota is another alternative, but in terms of size it's just short of full-size trucks; it's not as maneuverable and gets less-than-stellar fuel economy from its V-6 and V-8 engines.
Buying Tip
The Canyon can be had relatively cheaply, but 4WD V-8 Crew Cab models can exceed $35,000 if you go crazy with the options. Take it easy or you could end up spending more for a Canyon than you would for a more capable full-size pickup.
| Permalink:2010 GMC Canyon | |
2009 Kia Spectra
TheCarConnection.com's editors drove the new Kia Spectra in order to give you an expert opinion. TheCarConnection.com has also researched available road tests on the new Kia Spectra to produce this conclusive review, including a roundup of other choices, pros, and cons, to arm you with the most useful shopping advice.
Likes
Comfortable ride
Spacious interior
Price, value, and warranty
Dislikes
Engine noise when accelerating
Drab interior
Fuel economy should be better
No anti-lock brakes on most models
The 2009 Kia Spectra is a lot of car for the money, but it's outclassed by more refined competitors.
The 2009 Spectra is available in three trim levels: LX, EX, and the sporty SX. All versions feature Kia's 2.0-liter four-cylinder, which uses variable valve timing to generate 138 horsepower. The engine can be somewhat loud and thrashy when pushed hard. Fuel economy is unimpressive for a small car, with ratings of 24/32 mpg with the automatic and 23/30 mpg for the manual.
The Spectra feels peppy with the standard five-speed manual, but it's unusually responsive in the mid-rev range, so it works well with the relatively smooth-shifting four-speed automatic.
The 2009 Kia Spectra5 and the SX sedan have sportier suspension tuning, but the standard Spectra sedan favors ride comfort over sporty handling. The Spectra5 and the SX sedan feature wider tires that make these versions much more enjoyable to drive if you routinely navigate curvy roads, with only a slight change in ride quality. Note that these models have increased road noise, though. The SX models are distinguished by their black mesh grille, fog lights, rear spoiler, and larger 16-inch wheels.
Last year the Kia Spectra5 received a makeover from the front doors back, with hatchback convenience and a tall roofline that continues almost all the way to the rear of the vehicle, yielding impressive cargo space--especially when taking advantage of the fold-flat backseats.
The 2009 Kia Spectra has quite a bit of seating space, with a nicely proportioned height-adjustable driver's seat. The Spectra comes well equipped, but its interior appointments are a weakness; it's very basic in design, which is fine, but it lacks the lustrous materials and cohesive styling that's now par for the course, even among bargain-priced rides.
Those accepting only the safest will want to look elsewhere. The insurance-affiliated IIHS rates the Spectra with an Acceptable score in frontal protection and Marginal score in side protection. In federal government crash tests, the 2009 Kia Spectra earns five stars for frontal protection and four stars for side-impact protection. Front side airbags, as well as side curtain airbags for all outboard passengers, are standard on all Spectras. Anti-lock brakes remain optional on the Spectra.
Standard equipment on the 2009 Kia Spectra includes dual 12-volt power outlets in the center console, a 60/40 split-folding rear seat, a rear defroster, and a tilt steering column. An AM/FM/CD stereo with an auxiliary audio input jack is also standard. The EX and SX models get standard power windows and door locks, keyless entry, air conditioning, and floor mats. A leather-wrapped steering wheel and gearshift knob, metal sport pedals, and cruise control are also included with the SX, while an AM/FM/MP3 stereo with a six-disc in-dash CD changer and a power sunroof are SX-only options. Remote start is offered on the Spectra, but neither a Bluetooth hands-free system nor satellite radio is available.
The Bottom Line: The 2009 Kia Spectra has a roomy interior and respectable performance at a bargain price.
Other Choices
If you like the 2009 Kia Spectra, also consider:
- Toyota Corolla
- Ford Focus
- Mazda3
- Hyundai Elantra
Reason Why:
Many of the rival models in this segment have been restyled more recently than the Spectra, which bears a design that goes back to 2004. The Toyota Corolla has been recently redesigned, but like the Spectra it has a relatively soft, compliant ride and its interior feels cheaper than other rivals. However, the Toyota has a long-standing reputation for reliability and durability. The Ford Focus is perhaps the most attractive alternative; its design was recently refreshed, inside and out, and offers a great ride along with standout features such as the SYNC communications and entertainment interface. 2009 models drop the cheesy side gills that were introduced for 2008. The Mazda3 is the choice among these cars if a frisky driving sensation is a priority, but the Mazda's cabin can be noisy on coarse surfaces and its backseat is rather cramped. Although the Elantra shares its engine with the 2009 Kia Spectra, its interior is better designed, and the instrument panel and switchgear feel a step better. Also keep in mind that an all-new replacement, the Forte, is being introduced as an early 2010 model.
Buying Tip
If anti-lock brakes are a must on your shopping list (as they should be, especially for anyone in ice-storm reach), Kia has made it extremely hard to get them. They're not available on much of the 2009 Kia Spectra lineup, and on the SX, they're offered only with the sunroof (which cuts into headroom), an option grand total of $1,150.
| Permalink:2009 Kia Spectra | |
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart
TheCarConnection.com has studied a range of reviews covering the new 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart to produce this comprehensive full review. TheCarConnection.com's editors have also driven the Lancer Ralliart and bring forth their expert assessment.
Likes
Performance for the money
Overt exterior styling
Sharp, communicative steering
Reasonably roomy backseat
Dislikes
Lots of road noise inside
On-a-budget interior feel
Hesitation from dual-clutch gearbox in gentle driving
The 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart is a well-honed sporty sedan with a tuner-car look and feel--and an appearance that closely resembles that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which has been benched for the 2009 model year. The Ralliart is based heavily on the sportier GTS version of the economical Mitsubishi Lancer sedan, which is covered by a different review. While the Evolution made its debut last year, the Ralliart is new this year, and it lands between the sportiest standard Lancer sedan, the GTS, and the high-performance Evo in demeanor.
The 2009 Ralliart shares much, appearance and equipment-wise, with the Lancer GTS; however, the Ralliart does get the Evolution's lightweight aluminum hood with integral ductwork to keep the turbo cool, along with a more aggressively styled front bumper and dual exhaust.
The Ralliart gets a lower-boost, 237-hp version of the Evo's 291-hp 2.0-liter, tuned here for stronger low- and mid-rev response. The six-speed automated manual transmission, termed Twin Clutch-SST, that premiered in last year's Evo MR is now exclusively offered on the Ralliart, and it includes Normal and Sport driving modes.
Just like in the Evo, the Ralliart gets a sophisticated set of mechanical and electronic systems designed to get power smoothly to the pavement, even when the driver isn't using finesse or when the conditions aren't ideal. Highlights include Super All-Wheel Control, an Active Center Differential, a helical gear front differential, and Active Yaw Control. Altogether, these systems give the 2009 Mitsubishi Ralliart great agility and tractability.
In the opinion of several TheCarConnection.com editors, most daily drivers will prefer the 2009 Mitsubishi Ralliart to the Evolution, so there's no need to wait for the Evo to come back. Even though the Ralliart's engine produces 54 fewer horsepower, it actually feels stronger and smoother in most types of driving; and the twin-clutch transmission is an ideal companion, shifting quickly and responsively, with only a bit of hesitation in gentle acceleration. Overall, there's less of the rubber-band hesitation from the time you need more power until it's delivered in a mad rush.
The chassis underpinning the Ralliart doesn't feel quite as precise and unyielding as that of the Evolution, but that's mostly a good thing again for everyday driving. The steering is sharp and has a very quick ratio, along with good feedback, and stout brakes round out the package, although the suspension can rebound abruptly, temporarily flustering the Ralliart's otherwise good composure, when getting back on the power out of a bumpy corner. The Yokohama tires could be part of it; they hold on admirably but are a rather narrow 215 width. Those suspension trade-offs are worth it if you drive on bumpy roads; even though the 2009 Mitsubishi Ralliart allows a heavy dose of road noise inside, it's not downright jarring.
The interior of the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart is its failing; it's too similar to what's offered in the bargain-priced Lancer, and a little too no-frills for a car that can sticker well over $30,000. The backseat is actually spacious enough for small adults, and it includes a 60/40-split folding seatback to expand trunk cargo space.
The Ralliart comes very well equipped, with fog lamps, a hands-free entry system, a trip computer, automatic climate control, Bluetooth, leather trim, and aluminum pedals. Remote engine start and a nav system with music storage are among the options. The standard sport seats are firm and supportive, but the Recaro seat option--which brings perches more like those in the Evo--is worth getting; it includes HID headlamps and a bassy Rockford Fosgate sound-system upgrade.
Electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes, head-curtain side airbags, front-seat mounted side bags, and a driver knee airbag are all on the Ralliart's standard-features list. The 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart shares its body structure with the standard Lancer sedan, not the Evolution, so we can say that it will likely perform in a similar manner. The Lancer sedan got top "good" ratings from the IIHS in frontal offset and rear tests, as well as an equal mix of four- and five-star results in federal tests.
The Bottom Line: The 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart is essentially the daily-driving Evo, with every bit the racy look but not the jarring ride and peaky powertrain.
Other Choices
If you like the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart, also consider:
- BMW 135i
- Dodge Caliber SRT4
- Mazda Mazdaspeed3
- Subaru WRX
- Volkswagen GTI
Reason Why:
The 2009 Mitsubishi Ralliart takes on a very capable and fun-to-drive group of small sedans and hatchbacks. Its most direct rival is the Subaru WRX; for 2009 Subaru revised the WRX to get more power and a more aggressive driving feel than last year, though it still has a much smoother and quieter ride than the Ralliart. The Subaru is also tops in its class for safety and one of few smaller cars named a Top Safety Pick. The Dodge Caliber SRT4 is at the other end of the spectrum; it's a brute, with a peaky turbocharged engine and very firm suspension tuning that becomes hoppy on rough pavement. Its interior gets plenty of road noise, though the Caliber has some nifty features and spacious seating. In between is the Mazdaspeed3, which feels like a tuner car, with sharp reflexes and a powerful turbo engine, but it manages impressive interior comfort and refinement. VW's GTI isn't as overtly sporty; it's a daily driver with good performance and handling, compromised slightly for ride. At the top of the price range, but not all that much higher than a fully optioned Ralliart, is the BMW 135i; it's one of TCC's favorites for those who want a well-rounded performance coupe that also offers good comfort.
Buying Tip
If you live in a region with harsh winters, invest in two sets of tires to get the most out of this car. The Ralliart might have all-wheel drive, but it's not especially well-suited for the snow.
| Permalink:2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart | |
