2010 Volvo XC70 – V70 Bottom Line
TheCarConnection.com's editors drove the latest versions of the Volvo V70 and XC70 in order to give you an expert opinion. TheCarConnection.com's SUV experts then researched available road tests on the new Volvo V70 and XC70 to produce this conclusive review and to help you find the truth where other reviews might differ.
Likes
Practical and easy to load
Refined ride
Great-sounding Dynaudio stereo
Dislikes
Vague handling
Automatic transmission response
Poor fuel economy
The 2010 Volvo V70 and XC70 combine the brand's reputation for safety and quaint Swedish flair in a conventional station wagon body. The XC70 goes a step further by offering the ruggedness of an SUV with the practicality and dynamics of a station wagon, providing buyers with an alternative to regular mid-size SUVs. Changes for 2010 are kept to a minimum, though all models are now more fuel efficient.
The 2010 Volvo V70 and XC70 won't win any awards for styling, but they're hardly unpleasant. The XC70 looks a bit manlier, thanks to its protective lower-body cladding and skid plates; however, a new R-Design package for the V70 adds bigger wheels, a sport-tuned suspension, and unique styling elements inside and out. Inside, the V70 and XC70 feature a minimalistic look that's highlighted by Volvo's trademark "floating" center stack design.
Despite the update, the V70 and XC70 still suffer from poor fuel economy for their respective classes, and performance-wise, there's nothing to shout about for either. Last year Volvo added a new T6 AWD model to the XC70 lineup in an effort to boost its sporting credentials, offering slightly more performance over the base naturally aspirated 235-horsepower, 3.2-liter model. Its turbocharged six-cylinder engine displaces 3.0 liters and is rated at 281 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque. Both engines offer adequate pulling power, though fuel economy isn't very impressive. The output of the base engine dips to 225 horsepower for models sold in California-emissions states and rated with a partial-zero-emissions (PZEV) tag. With the 3.0-liter turbocharged engine, the XC70 can accelerate to 60 in 7.1 seconds—more than a second faster than the base engine. Fuel economy for both engines is 16 mpg city/22 mpg highway and 18 mpg combined. A six-speed automatic transmission is standard on all variants and provides smooth gear changes most of the time, although it can balk when a downshift is needed for hills. Also standard on the XC70 is a Haldex-sourced all-wheel-drive system that sends 95 percent of the power to the front wheels during normal driving and up to 65 percent to the rear wheels when conditions start to get slippery. This is ideal when off-roading, which the toughened wagon's higher ground clearance and heavy-duty suspension allow for.
Interior space is impressive for both passengers and their gear. The second row is split into three separate cushions, each of which folds forward flat to amplify cargo space. With the rear seats folded flat, the V70 can hold 71 cubic feet of cargo, while the XC70 can hold 72 cubic feet. All controls are well laid out and intuitive to reach. One nifty feature is the optional navigation system, which neatly tucks inside the dash when not in use. Ride quality is especially good if you get the automatic damping control, which firms up the suspension quickly when needed for sharper cornering control, allowing for a soft and absorbent ride under normal driving.
Volvo is a brand renowned for its safety prowess, so it's not surprising that the V70 and XC70 come packed with a bevy of safety features fitted as standard. The list includes anti-lock disc brakes, stability control, front-seat side airbags, full-length side curtain airbags, and anti-whiplash front head restraints. Integrated rear booster seats are standard on the V70 but remain an option on the XC70, as are a blind-spot monitor and recently introduced Technology package. This latter feature adds adaptive cruise control, collision warning with "Auto Brake" (which reduces brake reaction time by priming the pads up against the discs), a driver fatigue warning system, and lane-departure warning. Hill Descent Control also helps with slick, steep downhill slopes.
Standard goodies on the 2010 V70 include Bluetooth connectivity, fog lamps, heated side mirrors, a power driver's seat, keyless entry, cruise control, and dual-zone climate control. Optional extras include front and rear parking assist, heated front and rear seats, heated wiper nozzles, headlamp cleaners, active bi-xenon headlamps, a dual-screen rear DVD system, adaptive cruise control, and a 650-watt Dynaudio surround-sound system. Last year saw the introduction of a Technology Package (including adaptive cruise control and several accident-avoidance aids) that groups together the bi-xenon headlamps, the premium Dynaudio sound system, and Sirius Satellite Radio.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Volvo V70 and XC70 wagons offer lots of practicality and safety, providing buyers with an alternative to regular mid-size SUVs.
Other Choices:
If you like the 2010 Volvo V70 or XC70, also consider:
- Acura MDX
- Cadillac CTS Wagon
- Lexus RX 350
- Subaru Outback
- Volkswagen Passat Wagon
Reason Why:
Buyers considering the 2010 Volvo XC70 should be looking at other mid-size crossover vehicles: those that pair the tall body of an SUV with the underpinnings of a car, such as the Lexus RX 350 and Acura MDX. Both upmarket Japanese SUVs offer comparatively good refinement and ride quality, as well as carlike handling. The MDX is the sportier of the two, while the RX 350 is good for buyers putting the greatest weight on comfort and technology. Subaru's Outback offer a cheaper option to the V70 and XC70. The base Outback comes with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, but they feel sportier than the Volvos. The Passat Wagon is substantially more affordable than the V70, and its standard 2.0T engine is very fuel efficient. One other interesting new alternative is the 2010 Cadillac CTS Wagon, which offers more elegance, Cadillac's uniquely American styling cues, and a wagon's versatility. All models in this segment offer high levels of safety.
Buying Tip
If off-roading isn't a necessity, consider the 2010 Volvo V70 wagon. It features similar styling to the XC70 and drops the all-wheel-drive system in favor of better fuel economy.
| Permalink:2010 Volvo XC70 - V70 Bottom Line |  |
Toyota Corolla Being Reviewed For Potential Steering Issue
In recent weeks Toyota has managed two major acceleration-related recalls covering much of its lineup; this week it announced a braking-related recall on its iconic Prius tech flagship; and now, looking ahead, Toyota might be facing a steering issue as well on one of its best-selling vehicles.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed to Automotive News that it is reviewing a large number of steering complaints concerning the electric power steering system used in 2009 and 2010 Toyota Corolla sedans.
Going back to April 2008, NHTSA has logged a total of 83 complaints so far related to the steering, according to AN, with 76 of these reporting that the vehicle would unexpectedly pull to the side at higher speeds.
In all, the complaints cite a total of six accidents and ten injuries due to the phenomenon, which is described as a strong pulling to the side, like being buffeted by crosswinds, requiring two hands on the wheel to maintain a straight path.
Beginning with the 2009 model year, Toyota replaced the previous hydraulic power steering unit in the Corolla with an electric one. Newer electric power steering systems typically include logic to correct for environmental variables like the crown of the road as well as crosswinds, although we're not sure if the system in the Corolla does.
The Corolla from those model years is already covered by both of Toyota's two major accelerator-related recalls—for pedal entrapment (floor mats) and for an issue with a sticky pedal mechanism.
The review stage might presage a formal investigation, which then might eventually prompt a safety recall.
The 2009 and 2010 Toyota Matrix hatchback is closely related to the Corolla and thus might also be affected, as might the Pontiac Vibe. Both remain covered by the other two accelerator-related recalls.
According to Ward's, the supplier JTEKT Corp. produces electric power steering units for the Corolla, Matrix, RAV4, and Venza, along with the Lexus RX 350 and Pontiac Vibe. Previously, Toyota sources have confirmed to TheCarConnection.com that its EPS units follow a similar design across applications.
This story originally appeared at The Car Connection
| Permalink:Toyota Corolla Being Reviewed For Potential Steering Issue | |
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander Bottom Line
To get you the most useful information regarding the Mitsubishi Outlander, TheCarConnection.com has driven the refreshed 2010 Outlander GT, then selected highlights—including firsthand observations and comparisons to other models here in this Bottom Line—from reputable reviews from other sources.
Likes
Styling—especially new front end
Smooth, strong performance from V-6
Superb steering and handling
GT feels like a sport sedan
Dislikes
Boomy, slow four-cylinder
Road noise
Nearly useless third-row seat
Steering wheel doesn't telescope
Mitsubishi's Outlander compact crossover vehicle goes into 2010 with an all-new front end, a refreshed interior, and the introduction of the top-of-the-line Outlander GT model, plus next-generation technology features.
A subtle set of design changes takes the Outlander in a more carlike direction on the outside for 2010, with fewer rugged SUV cues and the sharklike "jet fighter" snout inherited from the Evo. Along with the front-end changes, the 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander gets new aero work in front, a mesh grille, a new rear fascia, redesigned hood and fenders, and on most models, chrome-accented side-sill extensions. Inside there are some much-needed soft-touch materials, including, for the top trims, soft double-stitched synthetic leather padding where elbows go and for some of the dash. The vents and dials also get new bright accents, and all but the base model gets a new multicolor LCD instrument display. Altogether, the Outlander now looks sportier on the outside and doesn't feel nearly as cut-rate inside.
A 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, making 168 horsepower, is standard on ES and SE models of the 2010 Outlander, but we'd probably discourage it for most buyers as it brings barely adequate performance with its continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT) and generates too much engine noise while accelerating. The 3.0-liter V-6 engine that's featured on XLS and GT models has a completely different personality, producing 220 horsepower delivered through a responsive, easy-shifting six-speed automatic with steering-wheel paddles. It has a lot more power to spare and gets fuel economy approaching that of the four on the highway. ES, SE, and XLS models of the Outlander remain offered with a choice of front-wheel drive or 4WD (with a center diff lock), while the new GT is the first Outlander to inherit an application of the Super-All Wheel Control (S-AWC) system used in the Evo and Ralliart. The system includes Tarmac, Snow, and Lock modes, selected with a knob on the center console, to cater the system's responses to specific conditions, with an Active Front Differential and electronically controlled center diff, for more seamless distribution of torque between the wheels.
No matter what the model, the Outlander has good, communicative steering. And like the Lancer, with which it shares some of its underpinnings, the Outlander handles better on the road than some of the more trucklike or rugged utility vehicles, with the nice, firm braking of a performance car. But the ride is quite firm, and it can be choppy over railroad tracks and the like. Also, at 3,780 pounds, the GT is just too heavy to be called agile (even though aluminum roof panels and other measures help keep the center of mass low). We also like the Outlander GT's paddle shifters, which are mounted alongside—rather than on—the steering wheel, making them easier to locate in tight hairpins, for instance.
About a foot shorter in overall length than most mid-size sedans, the 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander has good space for five, though its available seven-passenger seating—including a small third row—is a little optimistic. Even small children will feel the squeeze in back, but the second row slides fore and aft and reclines for good comfort, and the third and second rows fold to create an impressive, continuous cargo space of nearly 73 cubic feet behind the front seats. Cargo space is plentiful behind the second row, at 36.2 cubic feet but limited behind the third, at 14.9 feet. In front, several testers find the Outlander's driver's seat and seating position to be about right, though the steering wheel doesn't telescope, which might be an issue for shorter drivers. The backseats feel a little thin and flat, as they do in most other vehicles in this class, but they fold and tumble to a flat cargo floor. The Outlander has a rear tailgate configuration that's somewhat complex and clunky, but we can see owners finding it handy; the fold-down tailgate can support 440 pounds. Materials remain a bit of a disappointment, even though they're again improved for 2010. Up close, there's quite a lot of hard, dull plastic, though the upper dash now includes soft coverings and chrome-finished controls in some trims.
The Outlander has done extremely well in crash tests; it gets nearly perfect "good" scores from the IIHS for frontal offset and side impact, as well as in the seat-based rear-impact test. Its only blemish is an "acceptable" score in the new IIHS roof-strength test. It earns top five-star ratings in the federal government's frontal impact and side impact exams. All Outlanders come with front side airbags, side curtain bags covering the first two rows, front active headrests, electronic stability control, and anti-lock brakes.
The base 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander ES model has the four-cylinder and keeps it simple, though it includes air conditioning, keyless entry, and a 140-watt, six-speaker sound system. At the top of the lineup, the luxurious XLS picks up fog lamps, steering-wheel audio controls, remote start, cruise control, and automatic climate control, plus the new FUSE hands-free link system, controlling audio and calling functions with voice commands. The GT includes, along with other appearance extras, rain-sensing wipers, heated mirrors, leather seats, bi-xenon HID headlamps, and a more powerful 710-watt Rockford Fosgate premium sound system with nine speakers and a huge 10-inch subwoofer. The only major option is the $3,000 Premium Navigation and Leather Package, which adds a power driver's seat, heated front seats, leather upholstery, a rearview camera system, and a 40GB hard-drive nav system with music server, real-time traffic, and carpool lane guidance.
The Bottom Line: The Mitsubishi Outlander has a sportier look and feel than most crossover utes—and it gets better for 2010.
Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander, also consider:
- Honda CR-V
- Mazda CX-7
- Subaru Forester
- Toyota RAV4
Reason Why:
The most direct rival to the 2010 Outlander is likely the Toyota RAV4 Sport, which, like the Outlander, can be equipped with a small third-row seat. The RAV4 is much more refined and agreeable with the base four-cylinder engine, while its optional V-8 is even more powerful. The Forester is another top rival; in this case, too, the standard four in the Outlander doesn't seem nearly as strong as the standard flat-four in the Subaru, even though their power figures are close. The Mazda CX-7 seats only five, but it's perceived as a more complete performance package, with very comfortable seating, sporty suspension tuning, and a rorty turbocharged engine; for 2010 there's also a new base version, with a still-adequate 2.5-liter four, that costs a bit less. The Forester and CR-V remain the best for those who are safety-minded; they're both IIHS Top Safety Picks. For those who don't need a third row but want a roomy, comfortable interior, the Honda CR-V is probably the best pick, though it's not nearly as engaging to drive.
Buying Tip
If you want a hatchback but aren't sure you need the height and weight of the 2010 Mitsubishi, you might consider the new Sportback versions of the 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS and Ralliart.
This story originally appeared at The Car Connection
| Permalink:2010 Mitsubishi Outlander Bottom Line | |
Honda Fit Fire Recall: 646,000 Cars Globally, 140,000 In U.S.
It's been a bad week for Japanese carmakers. First Toyota (NYSE:TM) gets backhanded by the NHTSA over its ongoing unintended acceleration issues--and associated multi-million-car recalls--and now the Honda Fit faces recall over a fire hazard.
Honda (NYSE:HMC) today announced a recall of 646,000 Fit (Jazz outside the U.S.) compact hatchbacks due to a faulty master switch that could allow water to enter the power window switch, potentially causing a fire. Of those, 140,000 cars in the U.s. are subject to the recall.
While not as wide-ranging as the Toyota recall, the Fit recall, which affects 2007-2008 model-year cars, is no less dangerous. The car fire could potentially start at any time, causing property damage and personal injury--especially if while the car is driving down the highway, or parked in a garage. Already several vehicle fires have been reported, prompting Honda to issue the recall.
The fix is simple enough--Honda dealers will either retrofit the car with a new switch or put in a waterproof skirt. Of course, Toyota's fixes are simple enough as well--both the floormat recall and the unintended acceleration recall require little more than modification to the pedal assemblies and floormats.
This isn't the Honda Fit's first recall for weather-related problems on 2007-2008 models. In late 2007, Honda issued a recall for a problem with the occupant detection system for the front passenger airbag. If subjected to road salt in snowy areas, the salt and snow could cause corrosion, breaking the wire that detects if a child seat is present. This failure would then allow the airbag to deploy in the event of a crash, potentially injuring the child.
For more on the Toyota situation, read Bengt Halvorson's complete overview here, and if you have a 2007-2008 Honda Fit that's subject to the recall, Honda's customer service number is 1-800-999-1009.
[Wall Street Journal, Yahoo! News]
| Permalink:Honda Fit Fire Recall: 646,000 Cars Globally, 140,000 In U.S. | |
2010 Lincoln Navigator Bottom Line
TheCarConnection.com's editors took the wheel of the Lincoln Navigator to bring you their expert take on the big SUV, and supplement that with the highlights of the Web's best reviews to bring you a comprehensive picture.
Likes
Sophisticated American styling
Roomy, comfortable third row
Quick-shifting six-speed automatic
Ride and handling
Dislikes
Intrusive engine noise
Sluggish overall performance
Poor outward visibility
With over a decade on the roads and through several updates, the Lincoln Navigator is still as large and stately as ever, though some reviewers find the overall appearance a bit on the "bling" side of attractive. More upscale than the Ford Expedition, the Navigator is quiet and comfortable inside. Design and function of all the interior's core elements are good, and Lincoln's unique gauges are a fun touch.
Power for both 2010 Lincoln Navigator models comes from a 300-horsepower, 5.4-liter V-8 engine that drives either two or four wheels through a six-speed automatic transmission. Hauling is second nature to the Navigator, with a maximum tow rating of 9,100 pounds.
Handling is solid and stable, though it's a large SUV, not a sports car. The size and 6,200-pound curb weight of the vehicle also tax the 5.4-liter V-8 engine at times compared to other vehicles in the class. Shifting is slick and easy, though, turning low revs at highway speeds to reduce engine noise. Body roll is what you'd expect from a big, heavy SUV, but four-wheel independent suspension helps provide a smooth ride.
Seating is comfortable throughout, even in the oft-compromised third row. Power fold capability means the third row can be quickly and easily stowed when not in use, and as one of TheCarConnection's editors note, the power fold feature can be used to scoot faraway cargo toward the rear, as it moves the cargo aft when unfolding the seats.
Safety is a strong point with the new Navigator, rating five stars in front and side driver and passenger ratings with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Rollover ratings, despite the Roll Stability Control system, are lower at just three stars for the two-wheel-drive models and four stars for the four-wheel-drive models. Standard safety equipment includes safety canopy and side impact airbags; child tether system; Lincoln's Personal Safety System with safety belt pre-tensioners, load-limiting retractors, dual-stage front airbags, driver seat position sensor and crash severity sensor; and SOS post-crash alert system.
Two models are available, the Navigator and Navigator L; the latter is 14.7 inches longer than the standard model. The Navigator L also features 24.5 cubic feet of extra cargo capacity compared to the Navigator, which clocks in at 18.2 cubic feet total with the seats up. Fold the second- and third-row seats down and that figure grows to 103.5 cubic feet for the Navigator and 128.2 cubic feet for the L.
Improvements for 2010 include the addition across the range of the new SYNC and Sirius Travel Link features, plus Standard Trailer Sway Control as part of the AdvanceTrac stability system and MyKey technology, which allows Navigator owners to limit top speed and radio volume even when they're not in the car-and all are standard. All are also available on either the standard Navigator or the longer L. Other features introduced last year include a rearview camera system, rain-sensing windshield wipers, EasyFuel capless fuel fill, Front Park Assist, and heated second-row seats.
Other 2010 upgrades and options include standard power-deployable running boards to ease ingress and egress, as well as leather-trimmed seats.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Lincoln Navigator is a well-rounded, full-size SUV offering both luxury and performance.
Other Choices
If you're interested in the 2010 Ford Expedition, also consider:
- Infiniti QX56
- Lexus LX 570
- Land Rover Range Rover
- Mercedes GL-Class
- Cadillac Escalade
Reason Why
The 2010 Lincoln Navigator is a tech-laden large SUV with more aggressive styling than the Lexus or Infiniti offerings. Mercedes' GL-Class is a tough vehicle to beat, though, if you have the scratch to spend. The Land Rover Range Rover isn't as large as the Navigator, but it has serious off-road ability and drives better on-road, too. Cadillac's Escalade is the Navigator's most direct competition, and GM's offering is a bit ahead of the big Lincoln in terms of engine power and interior appointments. The Navigator still comes out ahead on the whole against the Caddy, however, with better handling, a more functional third-row seat, and lower price.
Buying Tip
The Navigator L is the best choice if you need to put adults in the third row. It also has more cargo space, but be sure you can find a place to park it!
| Permalink:2010 Lincoln Navigator Bottom Line | |
2010 Nissan Titan Bottom Line
To see how the 2010 Nissan Titan measures up against the competition, the editors of TheCarConnection.com have driven the Titan on- and off-road and present their overall assessment. Then TheCarConnection.com has also read other reviews, handpicking highlights that might help you make a smart buying decision.
Likes
Power and acceleration
Cargo-friendly features
Comfortable cabin and ride quality
Dislikes
Road and engine noise
Fuel economy
Lacks a lower-priced V-6 model
Thanks to styling that resists the almost identical cues used by other major truckmakers—along with a strong V-8 engine—the Titan stands out from the crowd. Yet those same attributes give the Titan limited appeal; while other full-size pickups try to be everything to everyone, with special focused models for all sorts of work and play, the 2010 Nissan Titan offers just one engine and a limited lineup that's aimed more at casual, recreational users than the hard-hat crowd, though there are some innovative features.
When the Nissan Titan was first introduced in 2004, it forged a new design direction and escalated a race toward "macho" styling we've seen in pickups over the past decade. The Titan broke through with an aggressive, upright appearance that included flared fenders combined with bright chrome details and clean side styling to give it a look that doesn't seem all that out of place in the city. It still looks fresh from the outside, but the same can't be said inside, where the instrument panel in particular looks dull and plasticky compared to newer designs.
All 2010 Nissan Titan models come with a powerful 5.6-liter DOHC V-8, rated at 317 horsepower and 385 lb-ft of torque and mated only to a five-speed automatic transmission. The engine provides strong acceleration and works very well with the standard five-speed automatic transmission. But fuel economy is poor; the combination gets ratings as low as 12 mpg city, and TheCarConnection.com has seen even worse numbers in real-world driving. The upside is that Titan models can tow up to 9,500 pounds with the King Cab and 9,400 pounds with the Crew Cab. Another strength is that on the road, the Titan somehow feels smaller than it is; it maneuvers reasonably well at low speed. Nearly all models are offered with rear-wheel drive or four-wheel drive, except PRO-4X off-road variants.
The cabin of the 2010 Titan is roomy and comfortable, with good seating for four full-size adults in Crew Cab versions. Shorter drivers will appreciate the power-adjustable pedals. But interior materials leave a lot to be desired; the drab look and feel of the interior plastics is tough to get over—particularly if you've tested other trucks in this class—but overall the interior is very functional, with lots of storage spaces for smaller items. Although the engine note is a bit too loud for some tastes, the Titan rides comfortably for a truck, with very little road or wind noise.
Although some might not get past the single-powertrain lineup, the Titan lineup includes four models (XE, SE, PRO-4X, and LE) and two body styles (King Cab and Crew Cab), as well as four bed sizes (5'5", 6'5", 7', and 8') and two wheelbases that go with these lengths, so you have plenty of combinations to choose from. Ford, Chevy, and Dodge still offer much larger ranges, including heavy-duty versions and more fuel-efficient models.
A full range of airbags is available on the 2010 Titan, along with anti-lock brakes and electronic stability control. The Titan gets "good" crash-test ratings in frontal tests from the IIHS, but achieves only a "marginal" rating in side impact and an "acceptable" rating in rear impact; additionally, it gets four- and five-star frontal ratings from the federal government.
Especially of interest is the off-road-focused PRO-4X, which includes heavy-duty components, tow hooks, Rancho shocks, off-road wheels and tires, a lockable storage box and locking tailgate, and a full-size spare. Options include a Bluetooth Hands-Free Phone System; an XM Satellite Radio tuner; a heated, leather-appointed bench seat; a revised center stack; and a larger, 8.0-inch DVD screen (up from 7.0 inches). An available Max Utility Package combines towing and bed-utility features, and for 2010, there's a new SE Value Truck Package that adds Bluetooth, captain's chairs, a power driver's seat, and fog lamps.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Nissan Titan performs well and has a comfortable interior, but its appeal is more limited than the full-line full-size trucks from the Big Three and Toyota.
Other Choices:
If you're interested in the 2010 Nissan Titan, also consider:
- Ford F-150
- Chevrolet Silverado 1500
- Dodge Ram 1500
- Toyota Tundra
Reason Why:
Overall, the 2010 Nissan Titan offers fewer powertrain and equipment combinations than other leading full-size pickups. Although with a V-8 and some cargo-friendly features like the lockable cargo box, the Titan is appealing for personal use, but it's not a favorite of fleets and hard-hat wearers. If you like what the Nissan has, then this doesn't matter. The 2010 Ford F-150 and Chevy Silverado are the two with the largest number of variations for every sort of use. The Ford has an excellent interior, especially for those who work out of their trucks, while the Chevy has excellent ride and handling attributes, plus good fuel economy. And just redesigned this past year, the Dodge Ram has much-improved ride and handling. Yet another option is the Toyota Tundra, which has perhaps the toughest, most imposing styling in the group, plus a very stylish cabin.
Buying Tip
If the fuel economy figures are tough to get past, you might consider the smaller Nissan Frontier, which does just fine with a V-6.
| Permalink:2010 Nissan Titan Bottom Line | |
2010 Porsche Boxster
TheCarConnection.com has researched a wide range of reviews from enthusiast and consumer sites around the Web to bring you a comprehensive Full Review of the 2010 Porsche Boxster. TheCarConnection.com's editors have also driven the Boxster and included their own driving opinions in this Bottom Line to help you make the most informed buying decision possible.
Likes
Capable, confident handling
Classic styling
Strong acceleration
Perfect tactile experience
Dislikes
Lack of storage spaces
Wind and road noise
Sound systems
Classic styling and a simple interior show the 2010 Porsche Boxster's strong connections to its sports car heritage. Clean lines and flowing curves look like they have sprung to life from the designer's table. An all-new model, the Boxster Spyder, ups the performance ante this year, as a more hardcore, lightweight performance version above the Boxster S, and it gets an appearance package including unique graphics to distinguish it at first sight.
Though it's Porsche's least expensive car, the Boxster is anything but cheap or cheaply made. Its base engine, a 255-horsepower 2.9-liter flat-six-cylinder, can be paired with either a six-speed manual transmission, or the high-tech seven-speed Porsche Doppelkupplungsgetriebe (PDK) dual-clutch automatic transmission. Acceleration with either is brisk, with Porsche quoting 5.8-second 0-60 mph runs for the manual and 5.5 seconds with the PDK. An optional Sport Plus package trims the PDK's time down to a mere 5.3 seconds.
The Boxster S is propelled by a larger, 310-horsepower, 3.4-liter six-cylinder available with the same transmissions as the standard Boxster. It accelerates to 60 mph with the manual is just 5.0 seconds; with the PDK, it takes 4.9 seconds, and with the Sport Plus package, that's shaved to a scant 4.7 seconds.
The all-new Boxster Spyder gets another bump in output to match the hardtop Cayman S at 320 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque. Weight for this highest-performance Boxster variant is trimmed to just 2,811 pounds, 176 pounds lighter than the Boxster S it's based on. That's enough to clip 0.2 second off the 0-60 mph times. A standard limited-slip differential and 20 mm lower sport suspension make the Spyder even more responsive. To get the weight savings, though, Porsche offers some concessions to comfort; the air conditioning is removed, and lightweight seats replace the comfortable but heavy standard-issue items. External weight-saving changes include the removal of daytime running lights and fog lamps, and the electric-powered soft top is swapped out for a manual version.
No matter which version you choose, the 2010 Porsche Boxster has brilliant road manners. Whether you're attacking a twisty back road or cruising the boulevard, the steering is natural, brakes strong and intuitive, and the manual transmission shifts with ease. Fuel economy is 19/27 mpg city and highway for the base Boxster with the manual, or 20/29 mpg with the PDK. The Boxster S scores 19/26 mpg with the manual and 20/29 with the PDK. The all-new Spyder hasn't yet been rated by the EPA.
You'll love the work environment of the 2010 Boxster, too. In all but the Spyder, the power convertible top is easy to use, the seats are well-bolstered with available sport seat upgrades, and the low front hood hides a decent amount of cargo space. Easy-to-use controls are placed conveniently at hand, and though the audio system leaves a bit to be desired and offers too many buttons to manage it, the experience isn't spoiled. In typical Porsche style, the Boxster's interior can be tweaked and tuned to fit almost any individual's style. A wide range of finishes, materials, trims, and themes can be chosen or designed by the buyer.
The list of standard equipment is extensive, exceeded only by the options available. Air conditioning is standard on all but the Spyder, as is a CD stereo, rear spoiler, partial-leather upholstery, heated washer nozzles, and locking alloy wheels.
Safety equipment is abundant, too, with standard anti-lock brakes and stability control, plus front, side, and head-protecting side-impact airbags mounted in the door window sills.
The Boxster hasn't been subjected to crash testing by either the IIHS or NHTSA, but fatality and injury statistics from accident data show Porsche drivers have historically fared well in accidents or managed to avoid them altogether.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Porsche Boxster is a fun, attractive, and capable roadster-everything you want it to be.
Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Porsche Boxster, also consider:
- Audi TT
- BMW Z4
- Mazda Miata
- Nissan 370Z
Reason Why
The BMW Z4 offers strong performance, a more passenger-friendly interior, and a standard retractable hardtop, but its bold exterior styling might be too much for some. The TT was just restyled in 2008, with a more conservative yet still fashionable look that may appeal more to enthusiasts; it drives more like a true sportscar as well. Nissan's new 370Z roadster has raw power, abundant traction, and its own brand of stunning looks, while Audi's TT roadster features all-wheel drive and a big V-6 among its strengths. Purists might actually prefer the simplicity of the Mazda Miata, which eschews most of the luxury and power of the Porsche, but costs about half as much as the Boxster. Still, with a high-revving four-cylinder engine and no-nonsense interior, the Miata has a charm of its own.
Buying Tip
The base is all the car you need for fun on the street, but if you have a need for serious speed, the Boxster S or Spyder is sure to please.
| Permalink:2010 Porsche Boxster |  |
Power: People Won’t Buy Cars From Companies Headed Into Oblivion
Things haven't looked so hot for Chrysler and General Motors this year. And now it's clear that assurances from the government and CEOs weren't enough to overcome the images of...well, sinking ships. And for the image-conscious, buying a car from a failing company or a retired brand? Not so great...
J.D. Power and Associates' latest study released yesterday puts some numbers on how many were deterred. As part of its seventh annual Avoider Study released yesterday, the company for the first time looked at future brand viability as a reason for avoidance and found that Chrysler, Dodge, Hummer, Pontiac, and Saturn were most avoided earlier this year because of an uncertain future.
The study looks at the reasons why shoppers fail to consider--or consciously avoid--certain models. Among the findings: one out of five shoppers avoided a vehicle because of concerns over the future of the brand, and these were the two brands most avoided for this reason.
"New vehicle buyers want to know that if anything goes wrong with their vehicle in a year or two that the manufacturer will be there to back up their product," said Kerri Wise, J.D. Power and Associates' director of automotive research, in a release accompanying the results.
Future viability of the brand ranked fourth after styling, pricing, and perceived reliability, with two of five shoppers saying attributing the look or styling of a vehicle as a reason for avoiding it. Power pointed to the Audi Q5, Dodge Challenger, Kia Soul, and Pontiac G3 as models that were commonly considered due to styling yet not commonly rejected for it.
While "Buy American" bumper stickers are certainly less common than they once were, an undercurrent of patriotic car-buying has surged over the past year, with a total of nearly 60 percent citing foreign or import origins of other vehicles as a reason for rejection.
The news here is good for Ford. Power noted that Ford had much lower rates of avoidance for these reasons and actually made improvements in the perception of its products, reducing the rate of avoidance for quality and reliability as well.
The results are based on nearly 45,000 responses from those who registered a new vehicle in May or June 2009, so the future of Saturn and Pontiac were still undetermined at that time.
---------------------
High Gear Media has partnered with Tesla Motors on a new writing contest where YOU can win a tour and road test of the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport. You can submit as many articles as you like and enter multiple times. Enter now!
| Permalink:Power: People Won't Buy Cars From Companies Headed Into Oblivion | |
2010 Land Rover LR4
TheCarConnection.com's editors tested the 2010 Land Rover LR4 and have written this road-test summary from firsthand driving impressions. Editors compared the LR4 with other off-road SUVs and assembled a companion full review that digests opinions from other car reviews into a comprehensive, easy-to-read review.
Likes
Real off-road ability
Big new V-8 power
Comfortable seats and driving position
Third-row seating option
Revamped interior looks expensive
Dislikes
SUV handling
Low gas mileage
Cargo area sits high off ground
Third-row seat's tough to access
Spotty reliability
The 2010 Land Rover LR4 returns for the new model year with its new name; last year, you knew it as the LR3. With the new initials comes a revised powertrain lineup of big V-8 engines, some cosmetic tweaks to its skin, and a revamped interior with a warm, upscale feel. The 2010 LR4 carries a base price of about $48,000 and competes most closely with the BMW X5, the Mercedes-Benz M-Class, the Audi Q7, the Volkswagen Touareg, and the Lexus GX 470.
It's been slightly tweaked for the new model year, but the LR4's styling mostly stays true to the former LR3. The upright, safari-chic look shares plenty with the smaller LR2 and the big Range Rover-though it's certainly the most vertically inclined. The cosmetic updates include painted bumpers, a new honeycomb grille, new headlamps, and tail lights. The LR4's interior earns the new-model name; it's completely fresh and swaps out the plasticky bits of the LR3 for a suave leather-trimmed dash with rich wood trim, softer-touch materials, and far more logical placement of controls. High-end trims get perks like walnut trim and premium leather with new stitching.
The LR4 sheds all its old Ford and BMW heritage (both companies owned the brand in the past) by adopting a new 5.0-liter V-8 engine. With 375 horsepower-75 hp more than last year's model-the LR4 feels almost fleet and nimble, with plenty of power to move it to 60 mph in under 7.5 seconds. A six-speed automatic transmission teams with four-wheel drive in a body that weighs nearly 6,000 pounds-which explains the LR4's dismal 12/17 mpg fuel economy. Rover fans know real-world driving will run toward the lower end of that scale.
The LR4 isn't as responsive on the road as carlike crossovers; the driving position is very tall, and it feels at first as if the LR4 is going to be tipsy in corners, but it maintains impressive composure in on-road cornering and on rough road surfaces better than most truck-based SUVs. That's thanks to an independent double-wishbone suspension with height-adjustable rear air springs and the LR4's range of electronic aids-and a series of revisions to its suspension and steering. A four-corner, independent, height-adjustable air suspension and Land Rover's exclusive Terrain Response system (with separate modes commanding the behavior of an armory of electronics for several different driving conditions, such as "mud and ruts" or "sand and dunes") help bring impressive off-road ability to the 2010 Land Rover LR4 without sacrificing on-road handling. A central-locking differential engages when conditions warrant maximum grip.
Comfort and quality have to be dealt with in different ways with the 2010 Land Rover LR4. For comfortable seating, the second-row passengers have it best. The LR4 requires a little taller step-in than crossover drivers will like, but the middle row has a good view of the world, and the bench seat is firm enough for long-distance comfort. In front, passengers get nicely shaped leather bucket seats with Land Rover's infinitely adjustable armrests-but they don't get much room for their knees, between the door panels and the wide center console. The optional third-row seat is strictly for children, but the "pedestal" third row has an elevated roof for more headroom and can fit adults in an emergency. It's very difficult to access, but it tucks away nicely when not in use. Five-passenger versions have a large cargo hold instead, and all LR4s have decent console and cubby storage, as well as a shallow top glove box teamed with a larger, lower compartment. The LR3 had a reputation for unreliable operation, and the LR4 swaps in new electronic controls for the entire vehicle and a new engine-so buyers should understand both before signing on.
The LR4 has not been crash-tested by either NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) or the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety). Front side airbags are standard on the 2010 Land Rover LR4, however, along with side curtain bags covering first- and second-row occupants. Anti-lock brakes are also standard and include an all-terrain mode.
The list of standard features on the 2010 Land Rover LR4 includes rear parking distance control, dual-zone climate control, and a nine-speaker Harman Kardon sound system. An upper-line HSE adds goodies like bi-xenon headlamps, power heated mirrors, a navigation system with off-road features, front park-distance control, Bluetooth connectivity, and magnificent 550-watt premium surround sound. Options include Sirius Satellite Radio, adaptive front lighting, and a cooler box. The front passenger seat has eight-way power adjustments, and the power-adjustable steering column has a memory function. New features include an LCD touchscreen to control audio and climate functions, as well as iPod connectivity.
The Bottom Line: The 2010 Land Rover LR4 takes on tough terrain with ease, and it's become more adept at imparting a carlike driving feel.
Other Choices
If you like the 2010 Land Rover LR4, also consider:
- Audi Q7
- Volkswagen Touareg
- Porsche Cayenne
- Mercedes-Benz M-Class
- BMW X5
- Lexus GX 470
Reason Why:
The VW Group builds three SUVs that compete directly with the Land Rover LR4. Closest is the Audi Q7, which is a polar opposite of the LR4 with its sleek aero silhouette, its low stance, its more accessible third-row seat, and its modern perspective on off-road performance. The Volkswagen Touareg is similar, though only a five-seater, while the Porsche Cayenne is a bit lighter and more road-oriented. Two of those vehicles offer fuel-conscious diesels. The five-passenger Mercedes M-Class offers another intriguing alternative for those who are conscious about gas-guzzling: the diesel ML320 CDI, which gets 18 mpg city, 24 mpg highway. The BMW X5 has a slightly higher price tag but also offers a third-row seat and, this year, adds a high-performance M version. Lastly, the Lexus GX 470 is new for 2010, and in an interesting turn of events, dials back its styling to a more straight-edged era, keeping its tall, narrow body and its five- or seven-passenger capability.
Buying Tip:
Remember, last year's LR3 is this year's LR4. Both are distinct from the smaller LR2. Don't short-seat yourself at the Land Rover dealer because of the name changes.
| Permalink:2010 Land Rover LR4 | |
Sales Lost To Dealer Tactics: J.D. Power Puts Numbers On It
Automotive brands are losing an average of 12 percent of their buyers to competitors due simply to "poor customer treatment" at the dealership.
If you've ever walked away from a dealership while new-car shopping due to icky sales tactics, you probably don't find that surprising, but it's one of many insightful findings from J.D Power and Associates in its annual Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) ratings, the cornerstone--and arguably the most important for dealerships--of its annual auto-industry surveys.
J.D. Power says that one in five shoppers who leave a dealership without buying do so specifically because of poor treatment or behaviors such as high-pressure sells, pricing games, or discourteous treatment, J.D. Power found. Of those, 43 percent ended up purchasing from a different dealership that sells the same brand, while 57 percent ended up opting for a different brand of vehicle.
According to Power, new-vehicle buyers shop at fewer than three dealerships, typically, and 49 percent visit only the selling dealership; for that reason it's especially important that dealerships treat customers with respect on their initial visit.
"In this difficult economy, dealerships are working particularly hard to close sales, but need to be attentive to customers without exerting unwanted sales pressure," said Jon Osborn, J.D. Power and Associates' director of automotive research, in a release accompanying the survey results.
The annual study looks at aspects satisfaction pertaining to the sales process itself, from the time a customers begin shopping at the dealership until they take delivery of a new vehicle. The five primary factors in the study are: dealership facility, salesperson, paperwork/finance process, delivery process, and vehicle price.
Overall, Jaguar, Cadillac, and Mercury ranked among the top-rated brands in this year's Sales Satisfaction Index, which is based on about 48,000 recent new-vehicle buyers.
Among luxury brands in the 2009 SSI, Jaguar and Cadillac stand well above the others, with a significant gap to Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, and Land Rover, which follow and are all above the segment average.
Looking at mass-market brands, Mercury placed at the top in sales satisfaction, with Smart a close runner-up. All of the mass-market brands from Ford and General Motors placed above average.
Mini earns the distinction of most improved for 2009; it's improved by 16 ranks, to sixth overall.
Mercury has just a few models for 2010--the Milan, Mariner, Mountaineer, and the rare Grand Marquis. It typically does quite well in the SSI, as it tends to share retail outlets with Lincoln, in smaller dealerships with more of a luxury feel and more personalized service, while Mini has been making an effort to better separate its operations from usually adjacent BMW ones, to help improve customer service. It seems to be working.
Audi ranks at the bottom among luxury brands, with Volvo and Infiniti also ranking especially low. Among mass-market brands, Mitsubishi is the lowest achiever by a long shot, with Jeep, Dodge, and Mazda also scoring low enough to earn just two Power Circles on JDPower.com's ratings for Sales Satisfaction.
| Permalink:Sales Lost To Dealer Tactics: J.D. Power Puts Numbers On It | |
